Applications of Ultrafine Limestone Sorbents for the Desulfurization Process in CFB Boilers

被引:45
|
作者
Cai, R. [1 ]
Ke, X. [1 ]
Huang, Y. [1 ]
Zhu, S. [1 ]
Li, Y. [1 ]
Cai, J. [1 ]
Yang, H. [1 ]
Lyu, J. [1 ]
Zhang, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn, Minist Educ, State Key Lab Power Syst,Dept Energy & Power Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTION; SULFUR CAPTURE; SULFATION REACTION; PORE-STRUCTURE; NOX EMISSIONS; SO2; REMOVAL; PARTICLES; N2O; OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.9b04747
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the stringent emission regulation taking effect, it is difficult for the conventional desulfurization technology in circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boilers to meet the requirements of ultralow SO2 emission. Therefore, in this paper, the application of natural ultrafine limestone, with a Sauter mean diameter of less than 20 mu m, was tested by conducting bench-scale, pilot-scale, and commercial-scale experiments to realize highly efficient desulfurization in CFB furnaces. In the past, such small-size limestone was considered unsuitable for CFB boilers. However, as demonstrated by bench-scale results, the desulfurization performance was clearly superior to that of coarse limestone, especially at low SO2 concentrations. In a 3 MWth pilot-scale CFB boiler, the ultrafine limestone exhibited competent desulfurization efficiency to that of the coarse limestone but clearly significant catalytic effects on NOx formation. As revealed by field tests in four commercial-scale CFB boilers, when high-efficiency cyclones were applied to CFB boilers, the mass inventory of ultrafine particles was significantly increased and the residence time would be extended accordingly; thus, the ultrafine limestone can be used to achieve high desulfurization efficiency and even ultralow SO2 emission with a favorable Ca/S ratio. Furthermore, a technical roadmap was drawn for the cost-effective control of SO2 emission.
引用
收藏
页码:13514 / 13523
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Limestone for In-Situ Desulfurization in CFB Boilers
    Lee, See Hoon
    Kim, Dong Won
    Lee, Jong Min
    Bae, Yong Chae
    KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (06): : 853 - 860
  • [2] Mechanical activation of sorbents for desulphurization in CFB boilers
    Szymanek, A
    Nowak, W
    Circulating Fluidized Bed Technology VIII, 2005, : 455 - 460
  • [3] Research progress of SO2 removal with limestone in CFB boilers
    Chen, Liang
    Wang, Chunbo
    Yan, Guangjing
    Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38 (05): : 2451 - 2460
  • [4] The kinetics and pore structure of sorbents during the simultaneous calcination/sulfation of limestone in CFB
    Chen, Liang
    Wang, Chunbo
    Wang, Ziming
    Anthony, Edward J.
    FUEL, 2017, 208 : 203 - 213
  • [5] Analysis of the Heat Loss due to Exhaust Gas of CFB Boiler with the Limestone Desulfurization
    Xu Hong
    Yang Dong
    Hu Ganggang
    Chen Haiping
    ICEET: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGY, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 41 - 45
  • [6] Thermal analysis of sorbents prepared for desulfurization process
    Renedo, J
    Fernandez, J
    Garea, A
    Viguri, JR
    Irabien, JA
    QUIMICA ANALITICA, 1996, 15 (01): : 91 - 94
  • [7] Kinetic Model of the Simultaneous Calcination/Sulfation Reaction and the Pore Change of Limestone in CFB Boilers
    Chen L.
    Wang C.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2019, 39 (23): : 6952 - 6963
  • [8] Sorbents Used for Biogas Desulfurization in the Adsorption Process
    Kwasny, Justyna
    Balcerzak, Wojciech
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2016, 25 (01): : 37 - 43
  • [9] Equipment and process modifications to improve the performance and reliability of CFB boilers
    Feher, G
    FIFTEENTH ANNUAL FLUIDIZED BED CONFERENCE, 1999, : 109 - 125
  • [10] Flue Gas Desulfurization in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres Using Modified Limestone Sorbents
    Kochel, Angelika
    Cieplinska, Aleksandra
    Szyrnanek, Arkadiusz
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2015, 29 (01) : 331 - 336