Algorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studies

被引:19
|
作者
Vecchione, Briana [1 ]
Levy, Karen [1 ]
Barocas, Solon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Microsoft Res, New York, NY USA
[3] Cornell Univ, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
FIELD EXPERIMENTS; DISCRIMINATION; LAKISHA; BLACK; POWER; RACE;
D O I
10.1145/3465416.3483294
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
"Algorithmic audits" have been embraced as tools to investigate the functioning and consequences of sociotechnical systems. Though the term is used somewhat loosely in the algorithmic context and encompasses a variety of methods, it maintains a close connection to audit studies in the social sciences-which have, for decades, used experimental methods to measure the prevalence of discrimination across domains like housing and employment. In the social sciences, audit studies originated in a strong tradition of social justice and participatory action, often involving collaboration between researchers and communities; but scholars have argued that, over time, social science audits have become somewhat distanced from these original goals and priorities. We draw from this history in order to highlight difficult tensions that have shaped the development of social science audits, and to assess their implications in the context of algorithmic auditing. In doing so, we put forth considerations to assist in the development of robust and engaged assessments of sociotechnical systems that draw from auditing's roots in racial equity and social justice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research agenda for algorithmic fairness studies: Access to justice lessons for interdisciplinary research
    Kontiainen, Laura
    Koulu, Riikka
    Sankari, Suvi
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 5
  • [2] FROM FINANCIAL AUDITING TO OPERATIONAL AUDITING IN INTERNAL AUDIT
    HARRMANN, A
    BETRIEB, 1975, 28 (38): : 1757 - 1761
  • [3] Algorithmic Discrimination and Social Justice from the Perspective of Value Philosophy
    Sun, Weiping
    FRONTIERS OF PHILOSOPHY IN CHINA, 2024, 19 (04) : 364 - 379
  • [4] Lessons for the Future of NAMs from History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science
    Ankeny, Rachel A.
    Davies, Gail F.
    Kirk, Robert G. W.
    Whittaker, Alexandra L.
    Johnson, Jane
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2024, 52 (05): : 276 - 284
  • [5] Auditing Work: Exploring the New York City algorithmic bias audit regime
    Groves, Lara
    Metcalf, Jacob
    Kennedy, Alayna
    Vecchione, Briana
    Strait, Andrew
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, ACM FACCT 2024, 2024, : 1107 - 1120
  • [6] Neoliberalism, Auditing, Austerity and the Demise of Social Justice
    Khoury, Peter
    SOCIAL ALTERNATIVES, 2015, 34 (03) : 25 - 33
  • [7] Pedagogical Possibilities: Lessons From Social Justice Educators
    Mthethwa-Sommers, Shirley
    JOURNAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION, 2012, 10 (04) : 219 - 235
  • [8] Trademarks and Social Media: Towards Algorithmic Justice
    Savirimuthu, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2016, 11 (06) : 474 - +
  • [9] A history of auditing: The changing audit process in Britain from the nineteenth century to the present day
    Toms, Steven
    BUSINESS HISTORY, 2007, 49 (01) : 136 - 136
  • [10] A history of auditing: the changing audit process in Britain from the nineteenth century to the present day
    Napier, Christopher J.
    ECONOMIC HISTORY REVIEW, 2007, 60 (01): : 201 - 202