The association of probable PTSD at baseline and pain-related outcomes after chronic pain rehabilitation: A comparison of DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria for PTSD

被引:11
|
作者
Andersen, Tonny Elmose [1 ]
Hansen, Maj [1 ]
Ravn, Sophie Lykkegaard [1 ,2 ]
Vaegter, Henrik Bjarke [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Psychol, InCoRE & THRIVE Res Grp, Odense, Denmark
[2] Specialized Hosp Polio & Accid Victims, Roedovre, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Pain Ctr, Pain Res Grp, Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
关键词
POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS; WHIPLASH INJURY; DISORDER; VALIDATION; PROPOSALS;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1899
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background There is a high prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with chronic pain. However, different patients are identified depending on the diagnostic system used. Moreover, it is unclear if the conceptualizations of PTSD are differently associated with outcomes of pain rehabilitation. Hence, the aims of the present study were first to explore the prevalence rates and diagnostic agreement of probable PTSD according to the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 screening tools (International Trauma Questionnaire [ITQ] vs. PTSD Checklist [PCL-5]), and secondly, to explore the associations of probable PTSD determined by ITQ and PCL-5 with psychological distress measures at baseline, and thirdly, the associations with pain and disability after pain rehabilitation adjusting for psychological covariates. Methods A consecutive cohort of patients with chronic non-malignant pain (n = 152) referred to a Danish interdisciplinary pain center was assessed at baseline prior to their first visit and at follow-up three days after completed treatment. Results The estimated probable PTSD baseline prevalence rates were 15.8% (ITQ) and 16.4% (PCL-5). However, the diagnostic agreement between the PCL-5 and the ITQ was only moderate (k = 0.64). Overall, compared to the ITQ probable PTSD according to the PCL-5 correlated more strongly with psychological distress. Only the ITQ was associated with poorer outcomes after rehabilitation, explaining alone 7-8% of the variance in disability and pain intensity adjusted for covariates. Conclusions The results underline the importance of taking the conceptualization and assessment of PTSD into consideration when investigating the impact of PTSD on pain rehabilitation. Significance There is a high prevalence of probable PTSD in patients with chronic pain. However, different patients with probable PTSD are identified depending on the diagnostic system used. Although similar probable PTSD prevalence rates (about 16%) were found using DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD screening tools (PCL-5 and ITQ, respectively), the diagnostic agreement between the systems was only moderate (k = 0.64). At the same time, only probable PTSD estimated according to the ITQ and not the PCL-5 was a significant predictor of disability after pain rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 718
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Epidemiology of DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in the Netherlands
    Hoeboer, Chris M.
    Nava, Federica
    Haagen, Joris F. G.
    Broekman, Birit F. P.
    van der Gaag, Rutger-Jan
    Olff, Miranda
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2025, 110
  • [2] Heterogeneity of PTSD Diagnostic Criteria: A Quantitative Comparison of DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-11
    Reid, Meredith
    Weathers, Frank
    Petri, Jessica
    Kramer, Lindsay
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 43 : S394 - S394
  • [3] Comparison of DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria for PTSD with DSM-IV and ICD-10: changes in PTSD prevalence in military personnel
    Kuester, Annika
    Koehler, Kai
    Ehring, Thomas
    Knaevelsrud, Christine
    Kober, Louisa
    Krueger-Gottschalk, Antje
    Schaefer, Ingo
    Schellong, Julia
    Wesemann, Ulrich
    Rau, Heinrich
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2017, 8 (01):
  • [4] A comparison of ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria for PTSD among a representative sample of Chinese earthquake survivors
    Cao, Chengqi
    Wang, Li
    Wu, Jianhui
    Bi, Yajie
    Yang, Haibo
    Fang, Ruojiao
    Li, Gen
    Liu, Ping
    Luo, Shu
    Hall, Brian J.
    Elhai, Jon D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [5] PTSD or not PTSD? Comparing the proposed ICD-11 and the DSM-5 PTSD criteria among young survivors of the 2011 Norway attacks and their parents
    Hafstad, G. S.
    Thoresen, S.
    Wentzel-Larsen, T.
    Maercker, A.
    Dyb, G.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (07) : 1283 - 1291
  • [6] A comparison of ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria of PTSD among Chinese trauma-exposed adolescent samples
    Wang, Li
    Fang, Ruojiao
    Chen, Chen
    Cao, Chengqi
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 14
  • [7] An item response theory analysis of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5: Implications for DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Silverstein, Madison W.
    Petri, Jessica M.
    Kramer, Lindsay B.
    Weathers, Frank W.
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2020, 70
  • [8] Differential predictors of DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 complex PTSD among African American women
    Powers, Abigail
    Fani, Negar
    Carter, Sierra
    Cross, Dorthie
    Cloitre, Marylene
    Bradley, Bekh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [9] Differences between ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD on DSM-5 section III personality traits
    Moller, Lise
    Sogaard, Ulf
    Elklit, Ask
    Simonsen, Erik
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [10] PTSD diagnoses and treatments: closing the gap between ICD-11 and DSM-5
    Lehrner, Amy
    Yehuda, Rachel
    BJPSYCH ADVANCES, 2020, 26 (03) : 153 - 155