The GFDL CM3 Coupled Climate Model: Characteristics of the Ocean and Sea Ice Simulations

被引:266
|
作者
Griffies, Stephen M. [1 ]
Winton, Michael [1 ]
Donner, Leo J. [1 ]
Horowitz, Larry W. [1 ]
Downes, Stephanie M. [2 ]
Farneti, Riccardo [3 ]
Gnanadesikan, Anand [1 ]
Hurlin, William J. [1 ]
Lee, Hyun-Chul [1 ,4 ]
Liang, Zhi [1 ,4 ]
Palter, Jaime B. [2 ]
Samuels, Bonita L. [1 ]
Wittenberg, Andrew T. [1 ]
Wyman, Bruce L. [1 ]
Yin, Jianjun [5 ]
Zadeh, Niki [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ 08542 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Atmospher & Ocean Sci Program, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Abdus Salaam Int Ctr Theoret Phys, Earth Syst Phys Sect, Trieste, Italy
[4] High Performance Technol Inc, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Geosci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
ANTARCTIC CIRCUMPOLAR CURRENT; THERMOHALINE CIRCULATION; WATER; HEAT; TRANSPORT; ATMOSPHERE; ATLANTIC; VOLUME; DEEP; FLUX;
D O I
10.1175/2011JCLI3964.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This paper documents time mean simulation characteristics from the ocean and sea ice components in a new coupled climate model developed at the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL). The GFDL Climate Model version 3 (CM3) is formulated with effectively the same ocean and sea ice components as the earlier CM2.1 yet with extensive developments made to the atmosphere and land model components. Both CM2.1 and CM3 show stable mean climate indices, such as large-scale circulation and sea surface temperatures (SSTs). There are notable improvements in the CM3 climate simulation relative to CM2.1, including a modified SST bias pattern and reduced biases in the Arctic sea ice cover. The authors anticipate SST differences between CM2.1 and CM3 in lower latitudes through analysis of the atmospheric fluxes at the ocean surface in corresponding Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) simulations. In contrast, SST changes in the high latitudes are dominated by ocean and sea ice effects absent in AMIP simulations. The ocean interior simulation in CM3 is generally warmer than in CM2.1, which adversely impacts the interior biases.
引用
收藏
页码:3520 / 3544
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response of the Tropical Indian Ocean to Greenhouse Gases and Aerosol Forcing in the GFDL CM3 Coupled Climate Model
    Li, Zhi
    Luo, Yiyong
    ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2018, 56 (01) : 40 - 54
  • [2] Sensitivity of sea ice and ocean simulations to sea ice salinity in a coupled global climate model
    Liu JiPing
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2010, 53 (06) : 911 - 918
  • [3] Sensitivity of sea ice and ocean simulations to sea ice salinity in a coupled global climate model
    JiPing Liu
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2010, 53 : 911 - 918
  • [4] Sensitivity of sea ice and ocean simulations to sea ice salinity in a coupled global climate model
    LIU JiPing State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics
    Science China(Earth Sciences), 2010, 53 (06) : 911 - 918
  • [5] Indian Ocean variability in the GFDL coupled climate model
    Song, Qian
    Vecchi, Gabriel A.
    Rosati, Anthony J.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2007, 20 (13) : 2895 - 2916
  • [6] The Dynamical Core, Physical Parameterizations, and Basic Simulation Characteristics of the Atmospheric Component AM3 of the GFDL Global Coupled Model CM3
    Donner, Leo J.
    Wyman, Bruce L.
    Hemler, Richard S.
    Horowitz, Larry W.
    Ming, Yi
    Zhao, Ming
    Golaz, Jean-Christophe
    Ginoux, Paul
    Lin, S. -J.
    Schwarzkopf, M. Daniel
    Austin, John
    Alaka, Ghassan
    Cooke, William F.
    Delworth, Thomas L.
    Freidenreich, Stuart M.
    Gordon, C. T.
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Held, Isaac M.
    Hurlin, William J.
    Klein, Stephen A.
    Knutson, Thomas R.
    Langenhorst, Amy R.
    Lee, Hyun-Chul
    Lin, Yanluan
    Magi, Brian I.
    Malyshev, Sergey L.
    Milly, P. C. D.
    Naik, Vaishali
    Nath, Mary J.
    Pincus, Robert
    Ploshay, Jeffrey J.
    Ramaswamy, V.
    Seman, Charles J.
    Shevliakova, Elena
    Sirutis, Joseph J.
    Stern, William F.
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    Wilson, R. John
    Winton, Michael
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Zeng, Fanrong
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (13) : 3484 - 3519
  • [7] Regional ocean climate simulations with a 3D ice–ocean model for the Baltic Sea. Part 2: results for sea ice
    H. Meier
    Climate Dynamics, 2002, 19 : 255 - 266
  • [8] Antarctic sea-ice simulations with a coupled ocean/sea-ice model on a telescoped grid
    Wolff, JO
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, VOL 27, 1998, 1998, 27 : 495 - 500
  • [9] Impact of Ocean Heat Transport on Arctic Sea Ice Variability in the GFDL CM2-O Model Suite
    Decuypere, Marine
    Tremblay, L. Bruno
    Dufour, Carolina O.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2022, 127 (03)
  • [10] Regional ocean climate simulations with a 3D ice-ocean model for the Baltic Sea. Part 2: results for sea ice
    Meier, HEM
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2002, 19 (3-4) : 255 - 266