Moving research beyond the spanking debate

被引:13
|
作者
MacMillan, Harriet L. [1 ,2 ]
Mikton, Christopher R. [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Offord Ctr Child Studies, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, McMaster Innovat Pk,Suite 201A,1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Offord Ctr Child Studies, Dept Pediat, McMaster Innovat Pk,Suite 201A,1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[3] Univ West England Bristol, Dept Hlth & Social Sci, Frenchay Campus,Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
Spanking; Physical punishment; Physical discipline; CHILD MALTREATMENT PREVENTION; CORPORAL PUNISHMENT; MASS-MEDIA; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; CAMPAIGNS; BEHAVIORS; PROGRAMS; PARENTS; HARSH;
D O I
10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.012
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Despite numerous studies identifying a broad range of harms associated with the use of spanking and other types of physical punishment, debate continues about its use as a form of discipline. In this commentary, we recommend four strategies to move the field forward and beyond the spanking debate including: 1) use of methodological approaches that allow for stronger causal inference; 2) consideration of human rights issues; 3) a focus on understanding the causes of spanking and reasons for its decline in certain countries; and 4) more emphasis on evidence-based approaches to changing social norms to reject spanking as a form of discipline. Physical punishment needs to be recognized as an important public health problem. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 8
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条