Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin

被引:12
|
作者
Slijkhuis, W. A. [1 ]
Noorda, E. M. [2 ]
van der Zaag-Loonen, H. [3 ]
Bolster-van Eenennaam, M. J. [4 ]
Droogh-de Greve, K. E. [1 ]
Lastdrager, W. B. [4 ]
Gratama, J. W. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gelre Hosp Apeldoorn, Dept Radiol, Oudegracht 3A, NL-3511 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Isala Klin, Dept Surg, Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Gelre Hosp Apeldoorn, Dept Epidemiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Gelre Hosp Apeldoorn, Dept Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Ultrasound; INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND; SURGICAL MARGINS; LOBULAR CARCINOMA; RE-EXCISION; LOCALIZATION; LUMPECTOMY; GUIDANCE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-016-3914-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ultrasound guidance (USG) during breast-conserving surgery improves tumor-free surgical resection margins. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether USG reduces resection volumes without compromising margin status. 134 patients with palpable or nonpalpable T1-2N0-1 invasive breast cancer were treated with USG and compared with a historical reference control group (CON) consisting of palpation-guided (PAG) or wire-guided localization (WIG) breast-conserving surgery. Primary outcomes were excess resection volume and clear margin status, and secondary outcome was re-excision rate. 66 patients underwent USG. In the CON group (n = 68), PAG was performed in 24 (35 %) and WIG in 44 (64 %) patients. Median excision volume [39 (IQR 20-66) vs 56 (38-94) cm(3); p = 0.001] and median calculated resection ratio [1.7 (1.0-2.9) vs 2.8 (1.4-4.6) (p = 0.005)] were significantly smaller in the USG than in the CON group. Median minimal distance to the resection margin [4 mm (IQR 2-5 mm) vs 2 mm (1-4 mm), p = 0.004] was significantly larger. Clear resection margins were achieved in 58 of the USG patients (88 %) and in 58 of the CON patients (86 %) (p = 0.91); this was true in patients with palpable as well as nonpalpable lesions. Reexcision was needed in 6.1 and 7.2 % respectively. Relative risk for re-excision in the USG group was 0.82 (95 % CI 0.23-2.93). In patients with palpable and nonpalpable breast cancers, USG allows for lower excision volume and reduced resection of healthy breast tissue, without increased re-excision rate.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 541
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin
    W. A. Slijkhuis
    E. M. Noorda
    H. van der Zaag-Loonen
    M. J. Bolster-van Eenennaam
    K. E. Droogh-de Greve
    W. B. Lastdrager
    J. W. C. Gratama
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 158 : 535 - 541
  • [2] Intraoperative ultrasound-guided breast conserving surgery for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer
    Cakmak, Guldeniz Karadeniz
    Emre, Ali U.
    Tascilar, Oge
    Bahadir, Burak
    Ozkan, Selcuk
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [3] A retrospective study of comparing the accuracy of ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery with palpation-guided excision in the determination of adequate surgical margins for early-stage palpable breast cancer
    Wang, W.
    Xing, H.
    Wang, K.
    Luo, X.
    Tang, L.
    BREAST, 2017, 32 : S125 - S126
  • [4] Resection Margins in Ultrasound-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Olsha, Oded
    Shemesh, David
    Carmon, Moshe
    Sibirsky, Ohn
    Abu Dalo, Ribhi
    Rivkin, Louis
    Ashkenazi, Itamar
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) : 447 - 452
  • [5] Resection Margins in Ultrasound-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Olsha, Oded
    Sibirsky, Ohn
    Carmon, Moshe
    Shemesh, David
    Rivkin, Luis
    Ashkenazy, Itamar
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : S184 - S184
  • [6] Resection Margins in Ultrasound-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Oded Olsha
    David Shemesh
    Moshe Carmon
    Ohn Sibirsky
    Ribhi Abu Dalo
    Louis Rivkin
    Itamar Ashkenazi
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 447 - 452
  • [7] Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence following breast-conserving surgery for early-stage invasive cancer
    Fowble, B
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1999, 38 : 9 - 17
  • [8] Hematoma-directed and ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable breast cancer after Mammotome biopsy
    Hiroki Inui
    Masahiro Watatani
    Yukihiko Hashimoto
    Toshiya Hojo
    Kyoko Hirai
    Munehisa Yamato
    Makoto Fujishima
    Tatsuya Azumi
    Hitoshi Shiozaki
    Surgery Today, 2008, 38 : 279 - 282
  • [9] Hematoma-directed and ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable breast cancer after Mammotome biopsy
    Inui, Hiroki
    Watatani, Masahiro
    Hashimoto, Yukihiko
    Hojo, Toshiya
    Hirai, Kyoko
    Yamato, Munehisa
    Fujishima, Makoto
    Azumi, Tatsuya
    Shiozaki, Hitoshi
    SURGERY TODAY, 2008, 38 (03) : 279 - 282
  • [10] Positive margin rates following breast-conserving surgery for stage I-III breast cancer: palpable versus nonpalpable tumors
    Atkins, Jordan
    Al Mushawah, Fatema
    Appleton, Catherine M.
    Cyr, Amy E.
    Gillanders, William E.
    Aft, Rebecca L.
    Eberlein, Timothy J.
    Gao, Feng
    Margenthaler, Julie A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 177 (01) : 109 - 115