Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Valero, M. G. [1 ]
Moo, T-A [1 ]
Muhsen, S. [1 ]
Zabor, E. C. [2 ]
Stempel, M. [1 ]
Pusic, A. [3 ]
Gemignani, M. L. [1 ]
Morrow, M. [1 ]
Sacchini, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Breast Serv, Dept Surg, 300 East 66th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Biostat Serv, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DUCT LOBULAR UNITS; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; AREOLA COMPLEX; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; RECONSTRUCTION; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; REDUCTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11616
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is being performed increasingly for risk reduction in high-risk groups. There are limited data regarding complications and oncological outcomes in women undergoing bilateral prophylactic NSM. This study reviewed institutional experience with prophylactic NSM, and examined the indications, rates of postoperative complications, incidence of occult malignant disease and subsequent breast cancer diagnosis. Methods Women who had bilateral prophylactic NSM between 2000 and 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Rates of postoperative complications, incidental breast cancer, recurrence and overall survival were evaluated. Results A total of 192 women underwent 384 prophylactic NSMs. Indications included BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in 117 patients (60 center dot 9 per cent), family history of breast cancer in 35 (18 center dot 2 per cent), lobular carcinoma in situ in 29 (15 center dot 1 per cent) and other reasons in 11 (5 center dot 7 per cent). Immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 191 patients. Of 384 NSMs, 116 breasts (30 center dot 2 per cent) had some evidence of skin necrosis at follow-up, which resolved spontaneously in most; only 24 breasts (6 center dot 3 per cent) required debridement. Overall, there was at least one complication in 129 breasts (33 center dot 6 per cent); 3 center dot 6 and 1 center dot 6 per cent had incidental findings of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer respectively. The nipple-areola complex was preserved entirely in 378 mastectomies. After a median follow-up of 36 center dot 8 months, there had been no deaths and no new breast cancer diagnoses. Conclusion These findings support the use of prophylactic NSM in high-risk patients. The nipples could be preserved in the majority of patients, postoperative complication rates were low, and, with limited follow-up, there were no new breast cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1312
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] One-Staged Silicone Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients at High Risk for Breast Cancer
    Atiyeh, Bishara
    Zgheib, Elias
    Sadigh, Parviz
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 37 (05) : 1063 - 1065
  • [2] One-Staged Silicone Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients at High Risk for Breast Cancer
    Bishara Atiyeh
    Elias Zgheib
    Parviz Sadigh
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2013, 37 : 1063 - 1065
  • [3] Nipple-sparing mastectomy in women at high risk of developing breast cancer
    Lewis, Rebecca S.
    George, Angela
    Rusby, Jennifer E.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2018, 7 (03) : 325 - 336
  • [4] One-Staged Silicone Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients at High-Risk for Breast Cancer
    Sahin, Ismail
    Isik, Selcuk
    Alhan, Dogan
    Yildiz, Ramazan
    Aykan, Andac
    Ozturk, Erkan
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 37 (02) : 303 - 311
  • [5] One-Staged Silicone Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients at High-Risk for Breast Cancer
    Ismail Sahin
    Selcuk Isik
    Dogan Alhan
    Ramazan Yıldız
    Andac Aykan
    Erkan Ozturk
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2013, 37 : 303 - 311
  • [6] Nipple-sparing mastectomy for patients with multifocal breast cancer
    Sakurai, T.
    Sasaki, E.
    Suzuma, T.
    Yoshumura, G.
    Umemura, T.
    Sakurai, T.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [7] Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    van Verschuer, Victorien M. T.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Gopie, Jessica P.
    Vos, Elvira L.
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 77 (02) : 145 - 152
  • [8] Prophylactic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and a Staged Breast Reconstruction Technique: Preliminary Results
    Tondu, Thierry
    Thiessen, Filip
    Tjalma, Wiebren A. A.
    BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 10 : 185 - 189
  • [9] Prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: Characteristics of Brazilian patients
    Frasson, Antonio
    Lichtenfels, Martina
    Vollbrecht, Betina
    Anton de Souza, Alessandra Borba
    Falcone, Ana Beatriz
    Barbosa, Fernanda
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 349 - 350
  • [10] Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Patients with Breast Cancer
    Kandice K. Ludwig
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2021, 13 : 35 - 41