Mental Training for Cognitive Improvement in Elderly People: What have We Learned from Clinical and Neurophysiologic Studies?

被引:7
|
作者
Li, Bin-Yin
Tang, Hui-Dong
Qiao, Yuan
Chen, Sheng-Di [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Rui Jin Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; Mental training; Mild cognitive impairment; Neural plasticity; Neurogenesis; EARLY ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; HEALTHY OLDER-ADULTS; FACE-NAME PAIRS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRAIN PLASTICITY; MEMORY PERFORMANCE; DEFAULT NETWORK; SPATIAL MEMORY; THETA ACTIVITY; DENTATE GYRUS;
D O I
10.2174/156720501206150716112918
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Cognitive impairment is a major concern in elderly people, and a variety of non-pharmacological therapies (NPTs) have been developed to help with cognitive decline. One of the most popular therapies is cognitive training, which includes pencil-and-paper puzzles, computerized games, or the combination of the two. Training is designed to have participants perform diverse exercises in one or more cognitive domains. Most clinical training trials indicate that well-organized tasks are clinically effective for cognitive improvement. Neural plasticity is a probable explanation for positive training effects. EEG and fMRI research show that the electrical activity and metabolism of specific brain areas are changed, and these changes are retained for a long period after training. Studies on mice to uncover the cellular and molecular changes underlying neural connectivity have found effective changes in brain networks after learning or training. Rac1 and NMDA receptors are thought to be involved in hippocampal neurogenesis, which is induced by learning. Here we review clinical trials of cognitive training, published during the last five years, and summarized some important characteristics of training tasks design. The probable role of neuronal plasticity and molecular mechanisms in training effects also are discussed. Most importantly, we discuss key ways to modifying the design of tasks based on studies we review. This review mainly identifies and discusses the reasons for positive training effects on cognition from clinical and neurophysiological perspectives. Based on the findings and their related mechanisms, further studies should design more effective and specific training tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 552
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE TRAINING OF COGNITIVE THERAPISTS - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM TREATMENT MANUALS
    DOBSON, KS
    SHAW, BF
    PSYCHOTHERAPY, 1993, 30 (04) : 573 - 577
  • [2] Stroke in elderly: What have we learned from stroke epidemiology in younger people
    Bejot, Y.
    Rouaud, O.
    Gentil, A.
    Caillier, M.
    Manckoundia, P.
    Pfitzenmeyer, P.
    Osseby, G. V.
    Moreau, T.
    Giroud, M.
    REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2008, 164 (10) : 809 - 814
  • [3] What have we learned from experimental studies?
    Gil-Nagel, A.
    EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 : 264 - 264
  • [4] What have we learned from challenge studies?
    Rausch, JL
    Coccaro, EF
    Nemeroff, CB
    Charney, DS
    Brewerton, TD
    Lahti, AC
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 45 (08) : 46S - 46S
  • [5] What have we learned from studies of migrants?
    McCredie, M
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1998, 9 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [6] What have we learned from pre-clinical juvenile toxicity studies?
    Bailey, Graham P.
    Marien, Dirk
    REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 28 (02) : 226 - 229
  • [7] What have we learned on aging from omics studies?
    Cellerino, Alessandro
    Ori, Alessandro
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 70 : 177 - 189
  • [8] What have we learned from proteomic studies of serum?
    Conrads, TP
    Veenstra, TD
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS, 2005, 2 (03) : 279 - 281
  • [9] SYNFLORIX™: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM IMMUNOGENICITY STUDIES?
    Wysocki, J.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 : 1 - 2
  • [10] Editorial: What have we learned from studies of migrants?
    Margaret McCredie
    Cancer Causes & Control, 1998, 9 : 1 - 2