Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System

被引:7
|
作者
Guinebretiere, Maryse [1 ]
Mika, Amandine [2 ]
Michel, Virginie [3 ]
Balaine, Loic [1 ]
Thomas, Rodolphe [1 ]
Keita, Alassane [1 ]
Pol, Francoise [1 ]
机构
[1] French Agcy Food Environm & Occupat Hlth & Safety, Epidemiol Hlth & Welf Unit, Ploufragan 22440, France
[2] Tech Inst Poultry ITAVI, Ctr INRA Val Loire, Birds & Poultry Biol Res Unit, Nouzilly 37380, France
[3] French Agcy Food Environm & Occupat Hlth & Safety, Direct Strategy & Programmes, 14 Rue Pierre & Marie Curie, Maisons Alfort 94701, France
来源
ANIMALS | 2020年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
laying hen; injurious feather pecking; rearing; feather cover; environmental enrichment; FEATHER-PECKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; LITTER PROVISION; RISK-FACTORS; DAMAGE; BEHAVIOR; WELFARE; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.3390/ani10030399
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary The practice of beak trimming in laying hens limits the negative consequences of injurious pecking, but could be prohibited by future regulations. We addressed in this study the question of how to prevent or minimize injurious pecking and its consequences, especially when beak trimming is not carried out. We found that a combination of different management strategies applied from rearing to laying stages improved to some extent the welfare of non-beak trimmed birds (lower mortality and fear of a novel object, better feather cover up to 61 weeks of age). Fiber supplementation in the feed did not provide any benefit on pecking-related problems. We suggest practical solutions to limit the consequences of injurious pecking where non-beak-trimmed animals are reared in barn system and transferred to furnished cages, while preserving good welfare, health and productivity. Abstract Beak trimming in laying hens limits the negative consequences of injurious pecking, but could be prohibited by future regulations. This study assessed a combination of management strategies during the rearing period (objects, perches, music, human presence) and laying period (scratching mats, objects, feed fiber supplementation) to raise non-beak-trimmed animals. The welfare and laying performances of beak-trimmed (T) and non-beak-trimmed (NT) ISA Brown birds were compared between groups with (E) or without (NE) these strategies, with or without fiber supplementation in the diet during laying period. Fiber supplementation did not provide any benefit on pecking-related problems. In comparison with NT-NE birds, NT-E birds had lower mortality, were less fearful of a novel object, and had a better feather cover, without a negative impact on productivity (same laying rate and egg quality). Although this study showed advantages of beak trimming (T birds had higher body weights, laying rates and lower hen mortality than NT birds), it highlighted related problems (increasing pullet mortality, decreasing early weights and increasing beak defects). This study proposes practical solutions to limit the consequences of injurious pecking in non-beak-trimmed animals.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: assimilating expert opinion
    Rodenburg, T. B.
    Tuyttens, F. A. M.
    de Reu, K.
    Herman, L.
    Zoons, J.
    Sonck, B.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2008, 17 (04) : 355 - 361
  • [2] Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: an on-farm comparison
    Rodenburg, T. B.
    Tuyttens, F. A. M.
    de Reu, K.
    Herman, L.
    Zoons, J.
    Sonck, B.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2008, 17 (04) : 363 - 373
  • [3] Feather Pecking in Non-Beak-Trimmed and Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens on Commercial Farms with Aviaries
    Schwarzer, Angela
    Plattner, Christina
    Bergmann, Shana
    Rauch, Elke
    Erhard, Michael
    Reese, Sven
    Louton, Helen
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [4] Genetic parameters of natural antibody isotypes and survival analysis in beak-trimmed and non-beak-trimmed crossbred laying hens
    Sun, Y.
    Ellen, E. D.
    Parmentier, H. K.
    van der Poel, J. J.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2013, 92 (08) : 2024 - 2033
  • [5] Behaviour and welfare of individual laying hens in a non-cage system
    Freire, R
    Wilkins, LJ
    Short, F
    Nicol, CJ
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2003, 44 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [6] Risk Factors for the Occurrence of Feather Pecking in Non-Beak-Trimmed Pullets and Laying Hens on Commercial Farms
    Schwarzer, Angela
    Rauch, Elke
    Bergmann, Shana
    Kirchner, Anna
    Lenz, Alice
    Hammes, Adriane
    Erhard, Michael
    Reese, Sven
    Louton, Helen
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [7] Modelling of feather pecking behavior in beak-trimmed and non-beak-trimmed crossbred laying hens: Variance component and trait-based approach
    Sun, Y.
    Ellen, E. D.
    van der Poel, J. J.
    Parmentier, H. K.
    Bijma, P.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2014, 93 (04) : 773 - 783
  • [8] Investigation of the Plumage Condition of Non-Beak-Trimmed Rhode ISLAND-Type Pedigree Hens in Cages and Alternative Pens
    Szasz, Sandor
    Milisits, Gabor
    Orban, Attila
    Farkas, Tamas Peter
    Peto, Lilla
    Mezoszentgyorgyi, David
    Garamvolgyi, Erik
    Horn, Peter
    Suto, Zoltan
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [9] European study on the comparative welfare of laying hens in cage and non-cage systems
    Elson, H. A.
    Croxall, Rebecca
    ARCHIV FUR GEFLUGELKUNDE, 2006, 70 (05): : 194 - 198
  • [10] Evaluation of the effects of cage height and stocking density on the behaviour of laying hens in furnished cages
    Albentosa, M. J.
    Cooper, J. J.
    Luddem, T.
    Redgate, S. E.
    Elson, H. A.
    Walker, A. W.
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 48 (01) : 1 - 11