Nonfarm employment, agricultural intensification, and productivity change: empirical findings from Uganda

被引:49
|
作者
Amare, Mulubrhan [1 ]
Shiferaw, Bekele [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Food Policy Res Inst IFPRI, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[2] World Bank Grp, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
C33; D24; Q12; 0120; Nonfarm employment; Agricultural intensification; Productivity change; Sample selection; Uganda; OFF-FARM WORK; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; INCOME; RISK; POVERTY; WELFARE; IMPACT; SMALLHOLDER; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12386
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article uses panel data from the Living Standards Measurement Study-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture for Uganda to assess the farm-level effects of nonfarm employment on agricultural intensification and productivity change. A sample selection model is used to account for both unobserved heterogeneity and potential simultaneity between agricultural production and nonfarm income. Results show that nonfarm employment can have differential impacts on farm technology intensity and productivity. Nonfarm income is found to have a positive impact on farm hired labor and improved seed intensity; a negative effect on on-farm family labor use; and no significant impact on fertilizer, soil water management, and joint use of farm technologies. The econometric evidence also indicates that agricultural productivity declines as nonfarm income increases. Taken together, our findings reveal important trade-offs between nonfarm employment and income and farm productivity growth under smallholder agriculture. The results indicated that targeted policies are required to reduce these potential trade-offs between nonfarm employment and agricultural intensification and productivity change.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 72
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonfarm employment, agricultural shocks, and poverty dynamics: evidence from rural Uganda
    Kijima, Yoko
    Matsumoto, Tomoya
    Yamano, Takashi
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 35 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [2] Biodiversity change with agricultural intensification in Uganda: a case study on birds
    Nalwanga, Dianah
    OSTRICH, 2007, 78 (02) : 167 - 167
  • [3] Ramifications of Households' Nonfarm Income on Agricultural Productivity: Evidence From a Rural Area of Pakistan
    Rashidin, Md Salamun
    Javed, Sara
    Liu, Bin
    Jian, Wang
    SAGE OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [4] Investigating the Gender Gap in Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Uganda
    Ali, Daniel
    Bowen, Derick
    Deininger, Klaus
    Duponchel, Marguerite
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 87 : 152 - 170
  • [5] Nonfarm employment, agricultural machinery service purchase and agricultural production efficiency:An empirical study based on China's major wheat-producing areas
    JI Lin
    Ecological Economy, 2023, (03) : 257 - 270
  • [6] Gender and agricultural Productivity: Econometric evidence from Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda
    Julien, Jacques C.
    Bravo-Ureta, Boris E.
    Rada, Nicholas E.
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 171
  • [7] Mobile Money, Agricultural Intensification, and Household Welfare: Panel Evidence from Rural Uganda
    Tabetando, Rayner
    Matsumoto, Tomoya
    Fani, Djomo Choumbou Raoul
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (03) : 515 - 530
  • [8] Forest change and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Indonesia
    Yamamoto, Yuki
    Shigetomi, Yosuke
    Ishimura, Yuichi
    Hattori, Mitsuru
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 114 : 196 - 207
  • [9] Strategies to increase agricultural productivity and reduce land degradation: evidence from Uganda
    Pender, J
    Nkonya, E
    Jagger, P
    Sserunkuuma, D
    Ssali, H
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 31 (2-3) : 181 - 195
  • [10] Agricultural intensification and climate change have increased the threat from weeds
    Storkey, Jonathan
    Mead, Andrew
    Addy, John
    MacDonald, Andrew J.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (11) : 2416 - 2425