Output-volatility reducing effects of automatic stabilizers: Policy implications for EMU member states

被引:1
|
作者
Sen, Huseyin [1 ]
Kaya, Ayse [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Publ Finance, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Dept Publ Finance, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Fiscal policy; Automatic stabilizers; PMG estimator; EMU member states; GOVERNMENT SIZE; FISCAL-POLICY; PANEL; LONG;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.06.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we empirically explore the output-volatility reducing impact of automatic stabilizers and look in detail at their policy implications for selected EMU member states comprising Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain for the period 1995-2017. Overall, the results suggest that automatic stabilizers deliver a statistically significant, but fairly weak, counter-effect on output volatility in the short run. More specifically, output-volatility responses to automatic stabilizers by a reduction between -0.012 and -0.097 percentage points depending on the proxy measure used for automatic stabilizers. However, the automatic stabilizing impact from taxes and government spending is statistically insignificant in the long run. The results point to two main policy implications: i) automatic stabilizers are an important fiscal mechanism just for the short-run output stabilization, but their output-volatility offsetting role and power are largely subject to proxy measures used for automatic stabilizers; ii) no matter what proxy measures are used, automatic stabilizers largely produce a weak stabilizing performance in dampening short-term output volatility. So, from a macroeconomic policy standpoint, it can be safely claimed that automatic stabilizers can just be an integral part of discretionary fiscal policy rather than being an alternative to it. (C) 2020 The Society for Policy Modeling. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1388 / 1414
页数:27
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] How Effective are Automatic Stabilizers in Reducing Aggregate Volatility in Korea?
    Kong, DongIk
    Woo, Jinhee
    KOREAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 38 (01): : 5 - 42
  • [2] Policy implications of the size of EMU for Europe and the United States
    Ghironi, F
    Giavazzi, F
    EMU AND THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY SYSTEM, 1997, : 421 - 481
  • [3] Output volatility in the OECD: Are the member states becoming less vulnerable to exogenous shocks?
    Andraz, Jorge M.
    Norte, Nelia M.
    ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2013, 18 : 91 - 110
  • [4] THE POLICY ACCEPTANCE IN THE UNITED-STATES OF RELIANCE ON AUTOMATIC FISCAL STABILIZERS
    BROWN, EC
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1959, 14 (01): : 40 - 51
  • [5] Monetary policy and asset prices - implications for new EU member states
    Komarek, Lubos
    PROCEEDINGS FROM THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE NEW EU MEMBER COUNTRIES, 2005, : 223 - 244
  • [6] Effects of Diabetes on the Output of Farmer and Its Policy Implications
    Naqvi, Syed A. A.
    Makhdum, Muhammad S. A.
    Husain, Bilal
    Kousar, Rakhshanda
    Shah, Syed A. R.
    KESMAS-NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 15 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [7] Effects of innovation performance and their economic policy implications - the position of new member states within the EU-25
    Kaderabkova, Anna
    PROCEEDINGS FROM THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE NEW EU MEMBER COUNTRIES, 2005, : 202 - 211
  • [9] Panel Data Evidence on the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks in the EU New Member States
    Borys, Pawel
    Cizkowicz, Piotr
    Rzonca, Andrzej
    FISCAL STUDIES, 2014, 35 (02) : 189 - 224
  • [10] The effects of European policy developments on health services for small Member States and remote communities
    Muscat, Natasha Azzopardi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 17 : 118 - 119