Review on Various Types of Geopolymer Materials with the Environmental Impact Assessment.

被引:39
|
作者
Zain, Hariz [1 ]
Abdullah, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri [1 ,2 ]
Hussin, Kamarudin [1 ,2 ]
Ariffin, Nurliyana [1 ,2 ]
Ridho, Bayuaji [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Engn Technol, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Ctr Excellence Geopolymer & Green Technol CEGeoTe, Arau, Malaysia
[3] Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember, Civil Engn Dept, Surabaya, Indonesia
关键词
STRENGTH; WASTE; ASH;
D O I
10.1051/matecconf/20179701021
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The development of green technology in the construction industry since 10 years ago is something to be proud of Malaysia. Several alternative geopolymer materials were invented in Malaysia such as fly ash, POFA, kaolin, metakaolin, and dolomite based geopolymer materials to achieve sustainable development especially in the building and construction sector. Those alternative materials are very important to replace the application of OPC, which is said to be the main cause of global warming. A review on the content of the chemical differences with the environmental impact resulting from the production of geopolymer is carried out in this study. In conclusion, fly ash based geopolymer material showed the best performance in terms of aluminosilicate content and also it is the best practice in the environmental protection applications for the moment. However, when compared with the OPC, fly ash geopolymer concrete was still able to reduce the effects of global warming potentials, but it is rather gave a negative impact on some aspects of the environment such as abiotic depletions, human toxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity and acidification.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LESSONS FROM A DECADE OF OFFSHORE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT.
    Beanlands, Gordon E.
    Duinker, Peter N.
    1984, 9 (3-4): : 157 - 175
  • [2] SYSTEM APPROACH TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
    Nakamura, Hideo
    Inamura, Hajime
    Okamoto, Noriyuki
    Otsuki, Tadashi
    1600,
  • [3] Community participation in Health Impact Assessment. A scoping review of the literature
    den Broeder, Lea
    Uiters, Ellen
    ten Have, Wim
    Wagemakers, Annemarie
    Schuit, Albertine Jantine
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 66 : 33 - 42
  • [4] Environmental impact assessment as a complement of life cycle assessment. Case study: Upgrading of biogas
    Morero, Betzabet
    Rodriguez, Maria B.
    Campanella, Enrique A.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 190 : 402 - 407
  • [5] Validation of the osteoarthritis impact assessment.
    Kosinski, M
    Bayliss, MS
    Bjormer, JB
    Ware, JE
    Laliberte, K
    Sullivan, E
    Vogel, SM
    Straus, WL
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2001, 44 (09): : S137 - S137
  • [6] STRATEGIES FOR MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT.
    Zirino, A.
    Pickwell, G.V.
    Henderson, R.S.
    Lapota, D.
    Johnston, R.K.
    Yamamoto, S.
    1600, (11): : 3 - 4
  • [7] Environmental assessment. The need for good practice
    Mine and Quarry, 1993, 22 (04):
  • [8] Environmental Impact Assessment for Performance-Oriented Geopolymer Concrete Research
    Talaat, Abdalla
    Emad, Abdulrhman
    Kohail, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2023, 35 (01)
  • [9] Environmental security and environmental management: The role of risk assessment.
    Lambert, James H.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (06) : 1730 - 1732