Computational analysis based on audioprofiles: A new possibility for patient stratification in office-based otology

被引:5
|
作者
Weininger, Oren [1 ]
Warnecke, Athanasia [1 ,2 ]
Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke [1 ]
Lenarz, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Stolle, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hearing4all German Res Fdn, Cluster Excellence, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Machine learning; Progressive hearing loss; Audiogram; Phenotype; Genotype; HEARING-LOSS; DYSFUNCTION; MUTATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; GENE;
D O I
10.4081/audiores.2019.230
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Genetic contribution to progressive hearing loss in adults is underestimated. Established machine learning-based software could offer a rapid supportive tool to stratify patients with progressive hearing loss. A retrospective longitudinal analysis of 141 adult patients presenting with hearing loss was performed. Hearing threshold was measured at least twice 18 months or more apart. Based on the baseline audiogram, hearing thresholds and age were uploaded to AudioGene v4 (R) (Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology at The University of Iowa City, IA, USA) to predict the underlying genetic cause of hearing loss and the likely progression of hearing loss. The progression of hearing loss was validated by comparison with the most recent audiogram data of the patients. The most frequently predicted loci were DFNA2B, DFNA9 and DFNA2A. The frequency of loci/genes predicted by AudioGene remains consistent when using the initial or the final audiogram of the patients. In conclusion, machine learning-based software analysis of clinical data might be a useful tool to identify patients at risk for having autosomal dominant hearing loss. With this approach, patients with suspected progressive hearing loss could be subjected to close audiological follow-up, genetic testing and improved patient counselling.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Office-Based Otology Procedures
    Fina, Manuela
    Chieffe, Douglas
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 52 (03) : 497 - +
  • [2] Office-based surgery and patient outcomes
    Young, Steven
    Shapiro, Fred E.
    Urman, Richard D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (06) : 707 - 712
  • [3] AN OFFICE-BASED APPROACH TO THE PATIENT WITH PRURITUS
    GRECO, PJ
    ENDE, J
    HOSPITAL PRACTICE, 1992, 27 (5A): : 121 - 128
  • [4] Patient safety and office-based anesthesia
    Urman, Richard D.
    Punwani, Nathan
    Shapiro, Fred E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 25 (06) : 648 - 653
  • [5] Patient safety in the office-based setting
    Clayman, Mark A.
    Seagle, M. Brent
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 119 (03) : 1128 - 1129
  • [6] Patient safety in the office-based setting
    Horton, JB
    Reece, EM
    Broughton, G
    Janis, JE
    Thornton, JF
    Rohrich, RJ
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (04) : 1335 - 1335
  • [7] Patient safety in office-based surgery facilities: I. Procedures in the office-based surgery setting
    Iverson, RE
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 110 (05) : 1337 - 1342
  • [8] New innovations in office-based rhinology
    Varshney, Rickul
    Lee, Jivianne T.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2016, 24 (01): : 3 - 9
  • [9] Office-based Care of the Neurogenic Bladder Patient
    Shenot P.J.
    Moy M.L.
    Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports, 2011, 6 (2) : 74 - 80
  • [10] Patient Experience With Office-Based Corneal Transplantation
    Parker, Jack
    Krijgsman, Marina
    Van Dijk, Korine
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    CORNEA, 2017, 36 (04) : 445 - 447