An Approximation Algorithm and Price of Anarchy for the Binary-Preference Capacitated Selfish Replication Game

被引:0
|
作者
Etesami, Seyed Rasoul [1 ]
Basar, Tamer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coordinated Sci Lab, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
来源
2015 54TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC) | 2015年
关键词
Capacitated selfish replication game; pure Nash equilibrium (NE); potential function; quasi-polynomial algorithm; price of anarchy; optimal allocation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We consider in this paper a simple model for human interactions as service providers of different resources over social networks, and study the dynamics of selfish behavior of such social entities using a game-theoretic model known as binary-preference capacitated selfish replication (CSR) game. It is known that such games have an associated ordinal potential function, and hence always admit a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium (NE). We study the price of anarchy of such games, and show that it is bounded above by 3; we further provide some instances for which the price of anarchy is at least 2. We also devise a quasi-polynomial algorithm O(n(2+ln D)) which can find, in a distributed manner, an allocation profile that is within a constant factor of the optimal allocation, and hence of any pure-strategy Nash equilibrium of the game, where the parameters n, and D denote, respectively, the number of players, and the diameter of the network. We further show that when the underlying network has a tree structure, every globally optimal allocation is a Nash equilibrium, which can be reached in only linear time.
引用
收藏
页码:3568 / 3573
页数:6
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Price of anarchy and an approximation algorithm for the binary-preference capacitated selfish replication game
    Etesami, Seyed Rasoul
    Basar, Tamer
    AUTOMATICA, 2017, 76 : 153 - 163
  • [2] A Random Tree Search Algorithm for Nash Equilibrium in Capacitated Selfish Replication Games
    Ahmadyan, Seyed Nematollah
    Etesami, Seyed Rasoul
    Poor, H. Vincent
    2016 IEEE 55TH CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2016, : 4439 - 4444