The Occurrence and Mass Distribution of Close-in Super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters

被引:461
|
作者
Howard, Andrew W. [1 ,2 ]
Marcy, Geoffrey W. [1 ]
Johnson, John Asher [3 ]
Fischer, Debra A. [4 ]
Wright, Jason T. [5 ]
Isaacson, Howard [1 ]
Valenti, Jeff A. [6 ]
Anderson, Jay [6 ]
Lin, Doug N. C. [7 ,8 ]
Ida, Shigeru [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Space Sci Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] CALTECH, Dept Astrophys, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Astron, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Astron & Astrophys, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] Space Telescope Sci Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[7] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Lick Observ, Univ Calif Observ, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[8] Peking Univ, Kavli Inst Astron & Astrophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[9] Tokyo Inst Technol, Meguro Ku, Tokyo 1528551, Japan
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DETERMINISTIC MODEL; PLANETARY FORMATION; EXTRASOLAR PLANETS; EXOPLANETS; SYSTEMS; SEARCH; STAR; TELESCOPE; COMPANION; VIRGINIS;
D O I
10.1126/science.1194854
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The questions of how planets form and how common Earth-like planets are can be addressed by measuring the distribution of exoplanet masses and orbital periods. We report the occurrence rate of close-in planets (with orbital periods less than 50 days), based on precise Doppler measurements of 166 Sun-like stars. We measured increasing planet occurrence with decreasing planet mass (M). Extrapolation of a power-law mass distribution fitted to our measurements, df/dlogM = 0.39 M-0.48, predicts that 23% of stars harbor a close-in Earth-mass planet (ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 Earth masses). Theoretical models of planet formation predict a deficit of planets in the domain from 5 to 30 Earth masses and with orbital periods less than 50 days. This region of parameter space is in fact well populated, implying that such models need substantial revision.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 655
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE ALBEDOS OF KEPLER'S CLOSE-IN SUPER-EARTHS
    Demory, Brice-Olivier
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2014, 789 (01)
  • [2] A reassessment of the in situ formation of close-in super-Earths
    Ogihara, Masahiro
    Morbidelli, Alessandro
    Guillot, Tristan
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2015, 578
  • [3] The minimum-mass extrasolar nebula: in situ formation of close-in super-Earths
    Chiang, Eugene
    Laughlin, Gregory
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 431 (04) : 3444 - 3455
  • [4] On the formation of hot Neptunes and super-Earths
    McNeil, D. S.
    Nelson, R. P.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 401 (03) : 1691 - 1708
  • [5] Orbital Evolution of Close-in Super-Earths Driven by Atmospheric Escape
    Fujita, Naho
    Hori, Yasunori
    Sasaki, Takanori
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 928 (02):
  • [6] Average Albedos of Close-in Super-Earths and Super-Neptunes from Statistical Analysis of Long-cadence Kepler Secondary Eclipse Data
    Sheets, Holly A.
    Deming, Drake
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 154 (04):
  • [7] Ejection of close-in super-Earths around low-mass stars in the giant impact stage
    Matsumoto, Yuji
    Gu, Pin-Gao
    Kokubo, Eiichiro
    Oshino, Shoichi
    Omiya, Masashi
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2020, 642
  • [8] Size Evolution of Close-in Super-Earths through Giant Impacts and Photoevaporation
    Matsumoto, Uji
    Kokubo, Eiichiro
    Gu, Pin-Gao
    Kurosaki, Kenji
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 923 (01):
  • [9] FORMATION OF CLOSE IN SUPER-EARTHS AND MINI-NEPTUNES: REQUIRED DISK MASSES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
    Schlichting, Hilke E.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2014, 795 (01)
  • [10] Possible Outcomes of Coplanar High-eccentricity Migration: Hot Jupiters, Close-in Super-Earths, and Counter-orbiting Planets
    Xue, Yuxin
    Masuda, Kento
    Suto, Yasushi
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 835 (02):