Modeling and verifying the topology discovery mechanism of OpenFlow controllers in software-defined networks using process algebra

被引:6
|
作者
Xiang, Shuangqing [1 ,3 ]
Zhu, Huibiao [1 ]
Wu, Xi [2 ]
Xiao, Lili [1 ]
Bonsangue, Marcello [3 ]
Xie, Wanling [4 ]
Zhang, Lei [5 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Shanghai Key Lab Trustworthy Comp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Comp Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Leiden Univ, LIACS, Niels Bohrweg 1, NL-2333 CA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] East China Normal Univ, Shanghai Key Lab Multidimens Informat Proc, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Formal verification; Modeling; SDN; Secure topology discovery; TopoGuard; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scico.2019.102343
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is an emerging paradigm, providing separation of concerns between controllers that manage the network and switches that forward data flow. SDN enables network programmability and reduces the complexity of network control and management. The OpenFlow protocol is a widely accepted interface between SDN controllers and switches. OpenFlow controllers are the core of Software-Defined Networks (SDNs). They collect topology information to build a global and shared view of the network, which is used to provide services for topology-dependent core modules and applications. Therefore, the accuracy of the centralized abstract view of the network is of outermost importance for many essential SDN operations. However, the topology discovery mechanism used in almost all the mainstream OpenFlow controllers suffers from two kinds of topology poisoning attacks: Link Fabrication Attack and Host Hijacking Attack. TopoGuard is a wide-spread secure OpenFlow controller, which improves the standard topology discovery mechanism, providing automatic and real-time detection of these two attacks. However, the mechanism of TopoGuard lacks formal verification, especially in the situation where some hosts are migrating to their new locations. In this paper, we propose a general parameterized framework, including the Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) models of the network components and the interfaces among them. Two loopholes of TopoGuard are found by implementing and verifying the proposed system model, which is an instance of the framework, in the model checker Process Analysis Toolkit (PAT). Moreover, we propose a new topology discovery mechanism based on TopoGuard, which solves the two loopholes. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient Topology Discovery for Software-Defined Networks
    Chang, Yi-Cheng
    Lin, Hsin-Tsung
    Chu, Hung-Mao
    Wang, Pi-Chung
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 18 (02): : 1375 - 1388
  • [2] Modeling and Verifying TopoGuard in OpenFlow-Based Software Defined Networks
    Xiang, Shuangqing
    Zhu, Huibiao
    Xiao, Lili
    Xie, Wanling
    PROCEEDINGS 2018 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (TASE 2018), 2018, : 84 - 91
  • [3] A Distributed Algorithm for Topology Discovery in Software-Defined Networks
    Ochoa-Aday, Leonardo
    Cervello-Pastor, Cristina
    Fernandez-Fernandez, Adriana
    TRENDS IN PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF SCALABLE MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, THE PAAMS COLLECTION, 2016, 473 : 363 - 367
  • [4] Efficient topology discovery in OpenFlow-based Software Defined Networks
    Pakzad, Farzaneh
    Portmann, Marius
    Tan, Wee Lum
    Indulska, Jadwiga
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 77 : 52 - 61
  • [5] eTDP: Enhanced Topology Discovery Protocol for Software-Defined Networks
    Ochoa-Aday, Leonardo
    Cervello-Pastor, Cristina
    Fernandez-Fernandez, Adriana
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 23471 - 23487
  • [6] Dynamic Topology Discovery Configuration in Software-Defined Vehicular Networks
    Papadakis, Athanasios
    Theodorou, Tryfon
    Mamatas, Lefteris
    Petridou, Sophia
    2022 IEEE CONFERENCE ON STANDARDS FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, CSCN, 2022, : 124 - 130
  • [7] On the placement of controllers in software-defined networks
    Hu, Yan-Nan
    Wang, Wen-Dong
    Gong, Xiang-Yang
    Que, Xi-Rong
    Cheng, Shi-Duan
    Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 2012, 19 (SUPPL. 2): : 92 - 97
  • [8] Towards a NetFlow implementation for OpenFlow Software-Defined Networks
    Suarez-Varela, Jose
    Barlet-Ros, Pere
    2017 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH INTERNATIONAL TELETRAFFIC CONGRESS (ITC 29), VOL 1, 2017, : 187 - 195
  • [9] OpenFlow Communications and TLS Security in Software-Defined Networks
    Agborubere, Belema
    Sanchez-Velazquez, Erika
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS (ITHINGS) AND IEEE GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (GREENCOM) AND IEEE CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CPSCOM) AND IEEE SMART DATA (SMARTDATA), 2017, : 560 - 566
  • [10] Self-Healing Topology Discovery Protocol for Software-Defined Networks
    Ochoa-Aday, Leonardo
    Cervello-Pastor, Cristina
    Fernandez-Fernandez, Adriana
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2018, 22 (05) : 1070 - 1073