Different electrostatic descriptors in comparative molecular field analysis: A comparison of molecular electrostatic and Coulomb potentials

被引:1
|
作者
Kroemer, RT
Hecht, P
Liedl, KR
机构
[1] SANDOZ GMBH, A-1235 VIENNA, AUSTRIA
[2] UNIV INNSBRUCK, DEPT GEN INORGAN & THEORET CHEM, A-6020 INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA
关键词
ATOMIC CHARGES; CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS; SEMIEMPIRICAL METHODS; NUCLEOPHILIC-ATTACK; VARIABLE SELECTION; RECEPTOR; COMFA; INHIBITORS; AGONISTS; BINDING;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) is a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (SD-QSAR) method which correlates precalculated fields surrounding a set of molecules with some target property. Among others, the electrostatic fields are commonly used. These are usually generated by calculating the Coulomb potential between a probe and the molecules bearing atom-centered point charges. The present study was performed in order to investigate up to which extent different methods to calculate electrostatic potentials can influence the results of a CoMFA. Therefore, a variety of charge calculation methods was applied to a data set consisting of 37 ligands of the benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist-antagonist active site. These methods included Gasteiger-Marsili, semiempirical (MNDO, AM1, and PM3), and ab initio (HF/STO-3G, HF/3-21G*, and HF/6-31G*) charges. Semiempirical as well as ab initio electron populations were derived both from the Mulliken population analysis (MPA) or from fitting the charges to the molecular electrostatic potential (ESPFIT charges). In addition, the molecular electrostatic potentials (MEPs) resulting from ab initio calculations were mapped directly onto the CoMFA grid. With regard to the cross-validated r(2) values (r(cv)(2)). of the resulting OSAR models, the ESPFIT-derived potentials yielded generally higher r(cv)(2) values than those resulting from MPA charges. For example, at the HF/3-21G* level the r(cv)(2) rose from 0.61 (MPA-derived potentials) to 0.76 (ESPFIT fields). The MEPs mapped directly onto the CoMFA grid were not superior to the corresponding ESPFIT-derived potentials. Semiempirical ESPFIT charges appeared to be of similar quality compared with ab initio ESPFIT electron populations in the CoMFAs. When no scaling between the steric and electrostatic descriptor matrices was applied, the electrostatic contributions were influenced to a high degree by the magnitude of the corresponding field values. (C) 1996 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1308
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Different electrostatic descriptors in comparative molecular field analysis: A comparison of molecular electrostatic and coulomb potentials
    Kroemer, Romano T.
    Hecht, Peter
    Liedl, Klaus R.
    John Wiley and Sons Inc., Newark, United States (17):
  • [2] ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS AS DESCRIPTORS OF MOLECULAR REACTIVITY - ANALYSIS OF SOME CORRECT PREDICTIONS
    WEINSTEIN, H
    OSMAN, R
    TOPIOL, S
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1980, 179 (MAR): : 94 - PHYS
  • [3] MEPSIM - A COMPUTATIONAL PACKAGE FOR ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF MOLECULAR ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS
    SANZ, F
    MANAUT, F
    RODRIGUEZ, J
    LOZOYA, E
    LOPEZDEBRINAS, E
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1993, 7 (03) : 337 - 347
  • [5] Softened electrostatic molecular potentials
    Besalu, Emili
    Carbo-Dorca, Ramon
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2013, 39 : 39 - 49
  • [6] APPROXIMATION OF MOLECULAR ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS
    KOSTER, AM
    KOLLE, C
    JUG, K
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 99 (02): : 1224 - 1229
  • [7] Molecular electrostatic potentials by systematic molecular fragmentation
    Reid, David M.
    Collins, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 139 (18):
  • [8] MOLECULAR ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS - A TOPOGRAPHICAL STUDY
    GADRE, SR
    KULKARNI, SA
    SHRIVASTAVA, IH
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 96 (07): : 5253 - 5260
  • [9] ELECTROSTATIC MOLECULAR POTENTIALS - MULLIKEN APPROXIMATION
    CARBO, R
    MARTIN, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 1975, 9 (02) : 193 - 214
  • [10] Molecular electrostatic potentials and noncovalent interactions
    Murray, Jane S.
    Politzer, Peter
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2017, 7 (06)