Warm-Season Grass Monocultures and Mixtures for Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Midwest, USA

被引:11
|
作者
Lee, Moon-Sub [1 ]
Mitchell, Rob [2 ]
Heaton, Emily [3 ]
Zumpf, Colleen [1 ]
Lee, D. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, 1120 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Sorghum & Forage Res Unit, USDA ARS Wheat, 251 Filley Hall,East Campus, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, 716 Farm House Lane, Ames, IA USA
关键词
Bioenergy crop; Warm-season grasses; Monoculture; Mixture; Precipitation; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; MOISTURE-CONTENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SWITCHGRASS; REGISTRATION; MANAGEMENT; PRECIPITATION; BIOFUELS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-018-9947-7
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Biomass yield and adaptability to a broad range of environments are important characteristics of dedicated energy crops for sustainable bioenergy feedstock production. In addition to yield potential, the role of species diversity on ecosystem services is also growing in importance as we seek to develop sustainable feedstock production systems. The objective of this study was to compare the biomass yield potential of the commercially available germplasm of native warm-season grasses in monocultures and in blends (mixture of different cultivars of the same species) or mixtures of different species across an environmental gradient (temperature and precipitation) in the Midwest, USA. Warm-season grasses including switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans [L.] Nash), sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.) and Miscanthus x giganteus (Greef and Deu.) were planted in 2009. Biomass was annually harvested from 2010 through 2015 for Urbana, IL and Mead, NE but only in 2010 and 2011 for Ames, IA. The effect of species in monocultures and mixtures (or blends) on biomass yields was significant for all locations. In monocultures, the annual biomass yields averaged over a 6-year period were 11.12 Mg ha(-1) and 10.98 Mg ha(-1) at Urbana and Mead, respectively, while the annual biomass yield averaged over a 2-year period was 7.99 Mg ha(-1) at Ames, IA. Also, the annual biomass yields averaged across the different mixtures and blends at each location were 10.25 Mg ha(-1), 9.88 Mg ha(-1), and 7.64 Mg ha(-1) at Urbana, Mead, and Ames, respectively. At all locations, M. x giganteus and Kanlow N1' produced the highest biomass yield in monocultures while mixtures containing switchgrass and big bluestem had the greatest mixture yield. The results from this multi-environment study suggest mixtures of different species provided no yield advantage over monocultures for bioenergy feedstocks in Illinois and Nebraska and both systems consistently produced biomass as long as April-July precipitation was near or above the average precipitation (300 mm) of the regions.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Warm-Season Grass Monocultures and Mixtures for Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Midwest, USA
    Moon-Sub Lee
    Rob Mitchell
    Emily Heaton
    Colleen Zumpf
    D. K. Lee
    BioEnergy Research, 2019, 12 : 43 - 54
  • [2] Management of warm-season grass mixtures for biomass production in South Dakota USA
    Mulkey, V. R.
    Owens, V. N.
    Lee, D. K.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (03) : 609 - 617
  • [3] Perennial warm-season grass monocultures and mixtures: Biomass production and soil improvement in semiarid and shallow soil conditions
    Susana Paredes, Silvia
    Pedro Stritzler, Nestor
    Bono, Alfredo
    Alejandro Distel, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2018, 154 : 82 - 88
  • [4] Impact of warm-season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois
    Zumpf, Colleen
    Lee, Moon-Sub
    Thapa, Santanu
    Guo, Jia
    Mitchell, Rob
    Volenec, Jeffrey J.
    Lee, DoKyoung
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2019, 11 (10): : 1202 - 1214
  • [5] Evaluation of Perennial Warm-Season Grass Mixtures Managed for Grazing or Biomass Production
    Bonin, Catherine L.
    Lal, Rattan
    Tracy, Benjamin F.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2014, 54 (05) : 2373 - 2385
  • [6] WARM-SEASON GRASS ESTABLISHMENT WITH ATRAZINE
    MARTIN, AR
    MOOMAW, RS
    VOGEL, KP
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (05) : 916 - 920
  • [7] Forage production and persistence characteristics of grazed native warm-season grass mixtures with or without nitrogen fertilizer
    Chappell, Caroline Nicole
    Marks, Marty Landon
    Mason, Katie Michelle
    da Silva, Liliane Severino
    Jacobs, Joshua Luke
    Mullenix, Mary Kimberly
    Dillard, Sandra Leanne
    Muntifering, Russell Brian
    GRASSLAND RESEARCH, 2022, 1 (03): : 157 - 165
  • [8] Sustainable, low-input, warm-season, grass-legume grassland mixtures: mission (nearly) impossible?
    Muir, J. P.
    Pitman, W. D.
    Foster, J. L.
    GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2011, 66 (03) : 301 - 315
  • [9] FORAGE YIELD, QUALITY, COMPATIBILITY, AND PERSISTENCE OF WARM-SEASON GRASS LEGUME MIXTURES
    POSLER, GL
    LENSSEN, AW
    FINE, GL
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (03) : 554 - 560
  • [10] Compatibility, yield, and quality of perennial warm-season grass-legume mixtures
    El Hadj, M
    Peterson, PR
    McKenna, JR
    Hutton, SJ
    Holtzman, GI
    AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, VOL 9, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 9 : 3 - 3