Running an open experiment: transparency and reproducibility in soil and ecosystem science

被引:14
|
作者
Bond-Lamberty, Ben [1 ]
Smith, A. Peyton [2 ]
Bailey, Vanessa [2 ]
机构
[1] US DOE, Joint Global Change Res Inst, Northwest Natl Lab, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[2] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Div Biol Sci, Richland, WA USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2016年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
open data; soil science; reproducible research; open science; GLOBAL DATABASE; REPEATABILITY; GENOME;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Researchers in soil and ecosystem science, and almost every other field, are being pushed-by funders, journals, governments, and their peers-to increase transparency and reproducibility of their work. A key part of this effort is a move towards open data as a way to fight post-publication data loss, improve data and code quality, enable powerful meta-and cross-disciplinary analyses, and increase trust in, and the efficiency of, publicly-funded research. Many scientists however lack experience in, and may be unsure of the benefits of, making their data and fully-reproducible analyses publicly available. Here we describe a recent 'open experiment', in which we documented every aspect of a soil incubation online, making all raw data, scripts, diagnostics, final analyses, and manuscripts available in real time. We found that using tools such as version control, issue tracking, and open-source statistical software improved data integrity, accelerated our team's communication and productivity, and ensured transparency. There are many avenues to improve scientific reproducibility and data availability, of which is this only one example, and it is not an approach suited for every experiment or situation. Nonetheless, we encourage the communities in our respective fields to consider its advantages, and to lead rather than follow with respect to scientific reproducibility, transparency, and data availability.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology
    Powers, Stephen M.
    Hampton, Stephanie E.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (01)
  • [2] Open Psychology: transparency and reproducibility
    Derksen, Maarten
    PSICOLOGIA CONOCIMIENTO Y SOCIEDAD, 2019, 9 (02): : 318 - 330
  • [3] USING THE OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK AND PRE-REGISTRATION TO ENHANCE RIGOR, TRANSPARENCY, AND REPRODUCIBILITY
    Salvatore, J. E.
    Barr, P. B.
    Kuo, I. C.
    Adkins, A. E.
    Dick, D. M.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 45 : 28A - 28A
  • [4] The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science
    Chin, Jason M.
    Growns, Bethany
    Sebastian, Joel
    Page, Matthew J.
    Nakagawa, Shinichi
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 340
  • [5] TRANSPARENCY, DOCUMENTATION, AND OPEN SCIENCE
    Isaacowitz, Derek
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 110 - 110
  • [6] The Open Science ecosystem
    Correa da Silva, Fabiano Couto
    da Silveira, Lucia
    TRANSINFORMACAO, 2019, 31
  • [7] TRANSPARENCY, DOCUMENTATION, AND OPEN SCIENCE
    Isaacowitz, Derek
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2021, 5 : 197 - 198
  • [8] INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: "OPEN SOCIAL SCIENCE CONFERENCE 2019 - PRACTICING NEW STANDARDS IN TRANSPARENCY AND REPRODUCIBILITY"
    Surova, Svetlusa
    POLITICKE VEDY, 2019, 22 (02): : 204 - 207
  • [9] Transparency and Open Science at the Journal of Personality
    Wright, Aidan
    Adler, Jonathan
    DeYoung, Colin
    Emily Durbin, Catherine
    Edelstein, Robin
    Jordan, Christian
    Locke, Kenneth
    Luo, Shanhong
    Lynam, Donald
    von Stumm, Sophie
    Zeigler-Hill, Virgil
    Tennen, Howard
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2021, 89 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [10] Publishing in the ecosystem of open science
    Luz Antunes, Maria
    Sanches, Tatiana
    Lopes, Carlos
    Alonso-Arevalo, Julio
    CUADERNOS DE DOCUMENTACION MULTIMEDIA, 2020, 31