Learning Effects of Attention Guidance in Online Discussions

被引:0
|
作者
Eryilmaz, Evren [1 ]
Thoms, Brian [2 ]
Kim, Rosemary [3 ]
Mary, Justin [4 ]
Fuchsman, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Bloomsburg Univ, Bloomsburg, PA 17815 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Channel Isl, Camarillo, CA USA
[3] Loyola Marymount Univ, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA
[4] IDA Sci & Technol Policy Inst, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
Design science; attention guidance; social constructivism; anchored discussion; learning efficiency; GUIDELINES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
This paper reports on the design and learning effects of an awareness mechanism integrated into an anchored discussion system. Drawing on social constructivist literature, the design aims to attract, retain, and if necessary reacquire students' attention on instructional materials' central principles in document-based asynchronous online discussions. To form a holistic picture, we operationalized learning across three dependent variables: perceived learning, knowledge gain, and learning efficiency. We performed an experimental study (N=64) across two sections of a blended-format human-computer interaction course to evaluate our design. Results show that the proposed design increased students' perceptions of learning. However, the difference in knowledge gain scores was marginally significant, and represented a medium effect size. Interestingly, we found that our design afforded more efficient learning. Moreover, we discovered students' perceptions of learning to be a significant predictor of their learning efficiency. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Attention Guidance in Online Learning Conversations
    Eryilmaz, Evren
    Thoms, Brian
    Mary, Justin
    Kim, Rosemary
    Van der Pol, Jakko
    2014 47TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2014, : 22 - 31
  • [2] Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes
    Kent, Carmel
    Laslo, Esther
    Rafaeli, Sheizaf
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2016, 97 : 116 - 128
  • [3] Engaging students for learning with online discussions
    Roehm, Stephanie
    Bonnel, Wanda
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NURSING, 2009, 4 (01) : 6 - 9
  • [4] Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning
    Vonderwell, Selma
    Liang, Xin
    Alderman, Kay
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2007, 39 (03) : 309 - 328
  • [5] Effects of self-regulated learning on cognitive engagement and learning achievement in online discussions
    Liu, Zhi
    Gao, Ya
    Zhang, Ning
    Long, Taotao
    Liu, Sannyuya
    Peng, Xian
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (35) : 28147 - 28162
  • [6] Detecting Platform Effects in Online Discussions
    Aragon, Pablo
    Gomez, Vicenc
    Kaltenbrunner, Andreas
    POLICY AND INTERNET, 2017, 9 (04): : 420 - 443
  • [7] Assessing and Scaffolding Collaborative Learning in Online Discussions
    Shaw, Erin
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: SUPPORTING LEARNING THROUGH INTELLIGENT AND SOCIALLY INFORMED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 125 : 587 - 594
  • [8] Using Online Discussions in a Blended Learning Course
    Holenko, Martina
    Hoic-Bozic, Natasa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2008, 3 : 18 - 23
  • [9] Learning to Recognize Sockpuppets in Online Political Discussions
    Nhut-Lam Nguyen
    Ming-Hung Wang
    Dow, Chyi-Ren
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (02): : 1873 - 1884
  • [10] Analysing online discussions: What are students learning?
    Cotton, Deborah
    Yorke, Jon
    WHO'S LEARNING? WHOSE TECHNOLOGY?, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 163 - 171