Risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

被引:140
|
作者
Whitson, BA [1 ]
Nath, DS [1 ]
Johnson, AC [1 ]
Walker, AR [1 ]
Prekker, ME [1 ]
Radosevich, DM [1 ]
Herrington, CS [1 ]
Dahlberg, PS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Div Cardiovasc & Thorac Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.08.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation has proposed a new grading system for primary graft dysfunction based on the ratio of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen measured within 48 hours after lung transplantation. Worsening primary graft dysfunction grade is associated with increased operative mortality rates and decreased long-term survival. This study evaluated donor and recipient risk factors for postoperative International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 3 primary graft dysfunction. Methods: We reviewed donor and recipient medical records of 402 consecutive lung transplantations performed between 1992 and 2004. We calculated a worst International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation primary graft dysfunction grade in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Severe primary graft dysfunction (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 3) was defined by a ratio of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen of less than 200. Associations of potential risk factors with grade 3 primary graft dysfunction in the first 48 hours postoperatively were examined through bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The 90-day mortality rate associated with the development of Intenational Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 3 primary graft dysfunction in the first 48 hours postoperatively was 17% versus 9% in the group without grade 3 primary graft dysfunction. Significant bivariate risk factors associated with this end point were increasing donor age, donor smoking history of more than 10 pack-years, early transplantation era (1992-1998), increasing preoperative recipient pulmonary artery pressure, and recipient diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis only recipient pulmonary artery pressure, donor acre, and transplantation era were associated with grade 3 primary graft dysfunction in the first 48 hours postoperatively at a P value of less than .05. Conclusions: Our analysis of donor and recipient risk factors for severe primary graft dysfunction identified patient groups at high risk for poor outcomes after lung transplantation that might benefit from treatments aimed at reducing reperfusion injury.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 80
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation
    Van De Wautver, C.
    Van Raemdonck, D. E. M.
    Coosemans, W.
    Decker, G.
    De Leyn, P.
    Dupont, L.
    Nafteux, P. H.
    Verleden, G. M.
    Lerut, T.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 26 (02): : S98 - S98
  • [2] Clinical Risk Factors for Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation
    Diamond, J. M.
    Lee, J. C.
    Kawut, S. M.
    Shah, R. J.
    Localio, A. R.
    Bellamy, S. L.
    Cantu, E.
    Lederer, D. J.
    Kohl, B. A.
    Lama, V. N.
    Bhorade, S.
    Crespo, M.
    Demissie, E.
    Sonett, J.
    Wille, K.
    Orens, J.
    Shah, A. S.
    Weinacker, A.
    Arcasoy, S. M.
    Shah, P. D.
    Wilkes, D. S.
    Ware, L. B.
    Palmer, S. M.
    Christie, J. D.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : S43 - S43
  • [3] Clinical Risk Factors for Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation
    Diamond, Joshua M.
    Lee, James C.
    Kawut, Steven M.
    Shah, Rupal J.
    Localio, A. Russell
    Bellamy, Scarlett L.
    Lederer, David. J.
    Cantu, Edward
    Kohl, Benjamin A.
    Lama, Vibha N.
    Bhorade, Sangeeta M.
    Crespo, Maria
    Demissie, Ejigayehu
    Sonett, Joshua
    Wille, Keith
    Orens, Jonathan
    Shah, Ashish S.
    Weinacker, Ann
    Arcasoy, Selim
    Shah, Pali D.
    Wilkes, David S.
    Ware, Lorraine B.
    Palmer, Scott M.
    Christie, Jason D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 187 (05) : 527 - 534
  • [4] Risk factors and outcome of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation in Korea
    Moon, Sungwoo
    Park, Moo Suk
    Lee, Jin Gu
    Jung, Ji Ye
    Kang, Young Ae
    Kim, Young Sam
    Kim, Se Kyu
    Chang, Joon
    Paik, Hyo Chae
    Kim, Song Yee
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (11) : 3275 - 3282
  • [5] The Effect of Donor Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis on Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation
    Knott, E. P.
    Zarrabian, B.
    Khalid, L.
    Sinha, N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [6] Risk factors for early mortality in patients with primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation
    Kuntz, C. L.
    Sager, J. S.
    Hadjiliadia, D.
    Ahya, V. N.
    Pochettino, A.
    Kotloff, R. M.
    Christie, J. D.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (02): : S171 - S171
  • [7] Risk factors for early primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: a registry study
    Kuntz, Catherine L.
    Hadjiliadis, Denis
    Ahya, Vivek N.
    Kotloff, Robert M.
    Pochettino, Alberto
    Lewis, James
    Christie, Jason D.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 23 (06) : 819 - 830
  • [8] Risk Factors and Survival Impact of Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation in a Single Institution
    Samano, M. N.
    Fernandes, L. M.
    Baranauskas, J. C. B.
    Correia, A. T.
    Afonso, J. E., Jr.
    Teixeira, R. H. O. B.
    Caramori, M. L.
    Pego-Fernandes, P. M.
    Jatene, F. B.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (08) : 2462 - 2468
  • [9] Primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation
    Hunt, Mallory L.
    Cantu, Edward
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 28 (03) : 180 - 186
  • [10] Primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation
    Suarez Lopez, V. J.
    Minambres, E.
    Robles Arista, J. C.
    Ballesteros, M. A.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2012, 36 (07) : 506 - 512