Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: Theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants

被引:185
|
作者
Dong, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Yuanjun [1 ,2 ]
Nzihou, Ange [1 ]
Chi, Yong [2 ]
Weiss-Hortala, Elsa [1 ]
Ni, Mingjiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Mines Albi, Ctr RAPSODEE, Campus Jarlard, F-81013 Albi, France
[2] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Clean Energy Utilizat, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Waste-to-energy technology; Environmental sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Non-toxic and toxic impacts; Large-scale commercial plants; Improvement and impediments; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCES; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; POTENTIAL IMPACT; SYSTEM; COMBUSTION; MSW; PERSPECTIVE; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.151
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Municipal solid waste (MSW) pyrolysis and gasification are in development, stimulated by a more sustainable waste-to-energy (WtE) option. Since comprehensive comparisons of the existing WtE technologies are fairly rare, this study aims to conduct a life cycle assessment (LCA) using two sets of data: theoretical analysis, and case studies of large-scale commercial plants. Seven systems involving thermal conversion (pyrolysis, gasification, incineration) and energy utilization (steam cycle, gas turbine/combined cycle, internal combustion engine) are modeled. Theoretical analysis results show that pyrolysis and gasification, in particular coupled with a gas turbine/combined cycle, have the potential to lessen the environmental loadings. The benefits derive from an improved energy efficiency leading to less fossil-based energy consumption, and the reduced process emissions by syngas combustion. Comparison among the four operating plants (incineration, pyrolysis, gasification, gasification-melting) confirms a preferable performance of the gasification plant attributed to syngas cleaning. The modern incineration is superior over pyrolysis and gasification-melting at present, due to the effectiveness of modern flue gas cleaning, use of combined heat and power (CHP) cycle, and ash recycling. The sensitivity analysis highlights a crucial role of the plant efficiency and pyrolysis char land utilization. The study indicates that the heterogeneity of MSW and syngas purification technologies are the most relevant impediments for the current pyrolysis/gasification-based WtE. Potential development should incorporate into all process aspects to boost the energy efficiency, improve incoming waste quality, and achieve efficient residues management. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 753
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of waste-to-energy technologies of gasification and incineration using life cycle assessment: Case studies in Finland, France and China
    Dong, Jun
    Tang, Yuanjun
    Nzihou, Ange
    Chi, Yong
    Weiss-Hortala, Elsa
    Ni, Mingjiang
    Zhou, Zhaozhi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 : 287 - 300
  • [2] Key factors influencing the environmental performance of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration Waste-to-Energy technologies
    Dong, Jun
    Tang, Yuanjun
    Nzihou, Ange
    Chi, Yong
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 196 (497-512) : 497 - 512
  • [3] Life cycle assessment modelling of waste-to-energy incineration in Spain and Portugal
    Margallo, M.
    Aldaco, R.
    Irabien, A.
    Carrillo, V.
    Fischer, M.
    Bala, A.
    Fullana, P.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (06) : 492 - 499
  • [4] Waste-to-Energy technologies for municipal solid waste management: Bibliometric review, life cycle assessment, and energy potential case study
    Chicaiza-Ortiz, Cristhian
    Penafiel-Arcos, Pedro
    Herrera-Feijoo, Robinson J.
    Ma, Wenchao
    Logrono, Washington
    Tian, Hailin
    Yuan, Wang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 480
  • [5] Decarbonising waste-to-energy: A life cycle assessment study
    Paulillo, Andrea
    Sebastiani, Alex
    Lettieri, Paola
    Materazzi, Massimiliano
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 209
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of thermal Waste-to-Energy technologies: Review and recommendations
    Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard
    Tonini, Davide
    Turconi, Roberto
    Boldrin, Alessio
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 37 : 104 - 115
  • [7] A life cycle assessment of environmental performances of two combustion- and gasification-based waste-to-energy technologies
    Arena, Umberto
    Ardolino, Filomena
    Di Gregorio, Fabrizio
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 : 60 - 74
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of paper and plastic packaging waste in landfill, incineration, and gasification-pyrolysis
    Demetrious, A.
    Crossin, E.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 21 (04) : 850 - 860
  • [9] Critical review on life cycle assessment of conventional and innovative waste-to-energy technologies
    Mayer, Felix
    Bhandari, Ramchandra
    Gaeth, Stefan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 672 : 708 - 721
  • [10] Inventory Analysis and Social Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste-to-Energy Incineration in Taiwan
    Lu, Yu-Tsang
    Lee, Yuh-Ming
    Hong, Chien-Yu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (11)