Agency problems and liquidity premium: Evidence from China's stock ownership reform

被引:16
|
作者
Chen, Chao [1 ]
Jin, Qinglu [2 ]
Yuan, Hongqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Finance & Accounting, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Split share structure reform; Liquidity premium; Agency problem; Compensation ratio; Mutual funds; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2011.02.007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Before the split share structure reform, China's publicly listed companies in domestic stock exchanges had two classes of stock: tradable and non-tradable shares. These two classes of stock had the same voting, cash flow, and all other legal rights except that non-tradable shares cannot be transferred at the open markets. From 2005, China implemented the reform to convert all non-tradable shares into tradable. In this reform process, the holders of non-tradable shares had to negotiate with their tradable counterparts to determine how much liquidity premium, or the compensation ratio, to pay the holders of tradable shares in order to obtain the liquidity right. Unlike previous studies, this paper starts with a theoretical model to identify the fundamental factors, including price discount before and after the reform, the percentage of non-tradable shares, the volatility of tradable share price, and the lockup period, that should determine the compensation ratio. We show that most of these factors are statistically significant in determining the compensation ratio. However, the agency problems induced by state and mutual fund ownerships weaken the role of the fundamental factors in determining the compensation ratios. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 87
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Politician control, agency problems and ownership reform - Evidence from China
    Xu, LXCL
    Zhu, T
    Lin, YM
    ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 2005, 13 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [2] Government ownership and stock liquidity: Evidence from China
    Ding, Mingfa
    Suardi, Sandy
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2019, 40
  • [3] ETF ownership and stock liquidity: evidence from China
    Wang, Nanjia
    Ma, Ziyu
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [4] Cultural diversity in ownership and stock liquidity commonality: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Hao
    Luo, Xian
    Han, Minghui
    Liu, Xiaojuan
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 40
  • [5] Corporate governance, institutional ownership, and stock liquidity of SMEs: evidence from China
    Liu, Wei
    Suzuki, Yoshihisa
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [6] Stock liquidity and corporate diversification: Evidence from China's split share structure reform
    Gu, Lifeng
    Wang, Yixin
    Yao, Wentao
    Zhang, Yilin
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2018, 49 : 57 - 80
  • [7] State ownership and stock liquidity: Evidence from privatization
    Boubakri, Narjess
    Chen, Ruiyuan
    El Ghoul, Sadok
    Guedhami, Omrane
    Nash, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 65
  • [8] Effect of the mixed ownership reform on the stock market: Evidence from China
    Gu, Xi
    Qiao, Sijia
    Wang, Yishi
    Song, Tianqi
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (03):
  • [9] How Foreign Institutional Investors' Ownership Affects Stock Liquidity? Evidence from China
    Lai, Fujun
    Wu, Qiong
    Xiong, Deping
    Zhu, Sha
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [10] Institutional Ownership and Stock Liquidity: Evidence From an Emerging Market
    Dinh, Ngoc Bao
    Tran, Van Nguyen Hong
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):