Improved sensory recovery with a novel dual neurorrhaphy technique for breast reconstruction with free muscle sparing TRAM flap technique

被引:20
|
作者
Puonti, Helena K. [1 ]
Jaaskelainen, Satu K. [2 ,3 ]
Hallikainen, Helena K. [1 ]
Partanen, Taina A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Savonlinna Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Savonlinna, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, SF-20500 Turku, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
PERIPHERAL-NERVE REPAIR; THERMAL-INJURIES; SENSIBILITY; INNERVATION; CONDUITS; BURN;
D O I
10.1002/micr.30064
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWe describe a new dual neurorrhaphy method for a free abdominal-based flap and compare sensory recovery with this novel technique to that with conventional neurorrhaphy technique for breast reconstruction. Methods70 breast cancer patients underwent muscle sparing innervated transversal rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (neuro ms-TRAM) breast reconstruction with either a novel dual neurorrhaphy technique (N=41) or single (N=29) neurorrhaphy only. Dual neurorrhaphy was performed on both sides and single neurorrhaphy on one side of the flap, using the end-to-end or end-to-side technique. Two years postoperatively, quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed for tactile, and thermal sensory modalities, and other tests included sharp-blunt, vibration, and two-point discrimination. Sensory modalities were scored either zero (abnormal) or one point (normal) at each test site against normal reference values (five sites for most tests). The total sensory scores (TSC) were calculated on the basis of the sums of the individual test scores, and all data are presented as the median (interquartile range, IQR). ResultsThe median of TSC in the breast reconstruction with the dual neurorrhaphy was higher (15.3, IQR 11.8-19.4), than that with the single neurorrhaphy (11.5, IQR 9.1-17.4) (P=0.037). Regarding the different sensory modalities, the dual technique especially enhanced the tactile (P=0.005) and cool detection (P=0.021) recovery compared to the single neurorrhaphy. ConclusionsDual neurorrhaphy improved the sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast, and may therefore be recommended for clinical practice. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:21-28, 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shaping of the abdominal flap in breast reconstruction: The coning technique in muscle sparing TRAM
    Rutherford, Claire Louise
    Tan, Bien-Keem
    Lim, Sue Zann
    Chew, Khong-Yik
    JPRAS OPEN, 2020, 25 : 93 - 98
  • [2] Sensory recovery following free TRAM flap breast reconstruction
    Liew, S
    Hunt, J
    Pennington, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1996, 49 (04): : 210 - 213
  • [3] Transverse Dual-Perforator Fascia-Sparing Free TRAM Flap: Technique Description
    Roth, Forrest S.
    Troy, Jared S.
    Schusterman, Mark A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (05) : 1039 - 1037
  • [4] Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: Is there a difference?
    Nahabedian, MY
    Tsangaris, T
    Momen, B
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (02) : 436 - 444
  • [5] Shaping of the abdominal flap in breast reconstruction: The coning technique in muscle sparing TRAM(vol 25, page 93, year 2020)
    Rutherford, C. L.
    JPRAS OPEN, 2021, 30 : 180 - 180
  • [6] A Safe and Efficient Technique for Pedicled TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Semple, John L.
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Alshaqsi, Sultan
    Armstrong, Kathleen
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (06) : 1022E - 1034E
  • [7] The fibula free flap: advantages of the muscle sparing technique
    Graham, RG
    Swan, MC
    Hudson, DA
    van Zyl, JE
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 56 (04): : 388 - 394
  • [8] Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction
    Nahahedian, MY
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (03) : 747 - 750
  • [9] The Cost Effectiveness of the DIEP Flap Relative to the Muscle-Sparing TRAM Flap in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Krishnan, Naveen M.
    Purnell, Chad
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    Freed, Gary L.
    Nigriny, John F.
    Rosen, Joseph M.
    Rosson, Gedge D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (04) : 948 - 958
  • [10] An alternative technique for managing the lower breast skin during secondary breast reconstruction with a TRAM flap
    Revis, DR
    Caffee, HH
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2000, 44 (02) : 135 - 142