Exploring the exceptional performance of a deep learning stream temperature model and the value of streamflow data

被引:81
|
作者
Rahmani, Farshid [1 ]
Lawson, Kathryn [1 ]
Ouyang, Wenyu [2 ]
Appling, Alison [3 ]
Oliver, Samantha [4 ]
Shen, Chaopeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, State Coll, PA USA
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Hydraul Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China
[3] US Geol Survey, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Middleton, WI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
stream temperature; machine learning; streamflow; deep learning; LSTM; WATER TEMPERATURE; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EQUIFINALITY; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/abd501
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stream water temperature (T-s) is a variable of critical importance for aquatic ecosystem health. T-s is strongly affected by groundwater-surface water interactions which can be learned from streamflow records, but previously such information was challenging to effectively absorb with process-based models due to parameter equifinality. Based on the long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning architecture, we developed a basin-centric lumped daily mean T-s model, which was trained over 118 data-rich basins with no major dams in the conterminous United States, and showed strong results. At a national scale, we obtained a median root-mean-square error of 0.69 degrees C, Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient of 0.985, and correlation of 0.994, which are marked improvements over previous values reported in literature. The addition of streamflow observations as a model input strongly elevated the performance of this model. In the absence of measured streamflow, we showed that a two-stage model could be used, where simulated streamflow from a pre-trained LSTM model (Q(sim)) still benefited the T-s model even though no new information was brought directly into the inputs of the T-s model. The model indirectly used information learned from streamflow observations provided during the training of Q(sim), potentially to improve internal representation of physically meaningful variables. Our results indicate that strong relationships exist between basin-averaged forcing variables, catchment attributes, and T-s that can be simulated by a single model trained by data on the continental scale.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Deep Learning in Ensemble Streamflow Forecasting: Exploring the Predictive Value of Explicit Snowpack Information
    Modi, Parthkumar
    Jennings, Keith
    Kasprzyk, Joseph
    Small, Eric
    Wobus, Cameron
    Livneh, Ben
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [2] Leveraging historic streamflow and weather data with deep learning for enhanced streamflow predictions
    Schutte, Christiaan
    van der Laan, Michael
    van der Merwe, Barend
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2024, 26 (04) : 835 - 852
  • [3] Evaluation of hyperspectral data for deep learning model performance
    Butler, Samantha J.
    Price, Stanton R.
    Carley, Samantha S.
    Land, Haley B.
    Price, Steven R.
    ALGORITHMS, TECHNOLOGIES, AND APPLICATIONS FOR MULTISPECTRAL AND HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING XXX, 2024, 13031
  • [4] Combining Synthetic and Observed Data to Enhance Machine Learning Model Performance for Streamflow Prediction
    Lopez-Chacon, Sergio Ricardo
    Salazar, Fernando
    Blade, Ernest
    WATER, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [5] Exploring Data Symbion EI Deep Learning and Model Sharing Modules
    Huszcza, Rafael
    Mendes, Amanda
    Lopes, Jeferson
    Borges, Eduardo N.
    Lucca, Giancarlo B.
    Guilherme, Pablo D. B.
    Pereira, Leandro A.
    INTELLIGENT DATA ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATED LEARNING - IDEAL 2024, PT II, 2025, 15347 : 349 - 360
  • [6] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ayana, Omer
    Kanbak, Deniz Furkan
    Keles, Muemine Kaya
    Turhan, Evren
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2023, 71 (06) : 2905 - 2922
  • [7] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ömer Ayana
    Deniz Furkan Kanbak
    Mümine Kaya Keleş
    Evren Turhan
    Acta Geophysica, 2023, 71 : 2905 - 2922
  • [8] Multi-Task Deep Learning of Daily Streamflow and Water Temperature
    Sadler, J. M.
    Appling, A. P.
    Read, J. S.
    Oliver, S. K.
    Jia, X.
    Zwart, J. A.
    Kumar, V
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 58 (04)
  • [9] Exploring System and Machine Learning Performance Interactions when Tuning Distributed Data Stream Applications
    Odysseos, Lambros
    Herodotou, Herodotos
    2022 IEEE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS (ICDEW 2022), 2022, : 24 - 29
  • [10] Performance Comparison of an LSTM-based Deep Learning Model versus Conventional Machine Learning Algorithms for Streamflow Forecasting
    Maryam Rahimzad
    Alireza Moghaddam Nia
    Hosam Zolfonoon
    Jaber Soltani
    Ali Danandeh Mehr
    Hyun-Han Kwon
    Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 : 4167 - 4187