Inter-Rater Reliability of Washington State?s Kindergarten Entry Assessment

被引:2
|
作者
Joseph, Gail [1 ]
Soderberg, Janet S. [1 ]
Stull, Sara [1 ]
Cummings, Kevin [1 ]
McCutchen, Deborah [1 ]
Han, Rachel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Coll Educ, 5001 25th Ave Northeast,Suite 201E, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
来源
EARLY EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT | 2020年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
ENGLISH-LANGUAGE LEARNERS; EARLY LITERACY SKILLS; AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT; TEACHERS RATINGS; YOUNG-CHILDREN; VALIDITY; ACCURACY; JUDGMENTS; CLASSROOM; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/10409289.2019.1674589
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research findings: This study explores the inter-rater reliability of WaKIDS, Washington State?s kindergarten entry assessment (KEA). Specifically, we analyze (1) the extent to which teachers? assessments are in agreement with a master code, (2) how often inaccurate assessment decisions lead to misidentification of school readiness, and (3) whether teacher characteristics influence the accuracy of teachers? assessment decisions. We created four video portfolios of students with diverse identities and skill levels and asked 54 kindergarten teachers across Washington State to evaluate each portfolio using an online survey version of the WaKIDS assessment. Data were analyzed with calculation of agreement percentages, cut-point score analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis. Results indicate that inter-rater reliability varies by developmental domain and is weaker for dual language learners and children with developmental delays. In addition, teachers? professional experiences are significant predictors of agreement level. Practice or policy: These results suggest a need for targeted professional development experiences for educators and further quantitative and qualitative investigation of kindergarten entry assessments. Ongoing evaluation and improvement of assessment tools across developmental domains and for diverse learners is crucial in order to strengthen the potential of KEAs for supporting all children?s learning and growth.
引用
收藏
页码:764 / 777
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ASSESSMENT OF INTER-RATER RELIABILITY
    BEARD, K
    STEWART, DA
    AGE AND AGEING, 1989, 18 (05) : 354 - 354
  • [2] Comparison between Inter-rater Reliability and Inter-rater Agreement in Performance Assessment
    Liao, Shih Chieh
    Hunt, Elizabeth A.
    Chen, Walter
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2010, 39 (08) : 613 - 618
  • [3] Kendall's W and Inter-rater Reliability
    Emerson, Robert Wall
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2023, 117 (04) : 336 - 336
  • [4] The Inter-Rater Reliability of Technical Skills Assessment and Retention of Rater Training
    Gawad, Nada
    Fowler, Amanda
    Mimeault, Richard
    Raiche, Isabelle
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 76 (04) : 1088 - 1093
  • [5] Testing the Reliability of Inter-Rater Reliability
    Eagan, Brendan
    Brohinsky, Jais
    Wang, Jingyi
    Shaffer, David Williamson
    LAK20: THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE, 2020, : 454 - 461
  • [6] Measuring Essay Assessment: Intra-rater and Inter-rater Reliability
    Kayapinar, Ulas
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, (57): : 113 - 135
  • [7] Inter-rater reliability of the Play Assessment for Group Settings
    Lautamo, Tiina
    Heikkila, Maija
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2011, 18 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [8] OWAS inter-rater reliability
    Lins, Christian
    Fudickar, Sebastian
    Hein, Andreas
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2021, 93
  • [9] Inter-rater reliability of the Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool
    Rose, Caelin
    Wainwright, Wendy
    Downing, Michael
    Lesperance, Mary
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2011, 9 (02) : 153 - 164
  • [10] Inter-rater reliability of the Conversational Assessment of Neurocognitive Dysfunction
    Oba, Hikaru
    Hiyama, Masami
    Okamoto, Haruka
    Onoda, Rika
    Matsuoka, Teruyuki
    Sato, Shinichi
    Narumoto, Jin
    PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2023, 23 (04) : 667 - 674