Chemotherapy with an every-2-week regimen of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in patients with transitional cell carcinoma who have received prior cisplatin-based therapy

被引:4
|
作者
Sternberg, CN
Calabrò, F
Pizzocaro, G
Marini, L
Schnetzer, S
Sella, A
机构
[1] Vincenzo Pansadoro Fdn, Clin Pio XI, I-00165 Rome, Italy
[2] Natl Tumor Inst, Milan, Italy
[3] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
second-line chemotherapy; gemcitabine; paclitaxel; recurrent transitional cell carcinoma;
D O I
10.1002/1097-0142(20011215)92:12<2993::AID-CNCR10108>3.0.CO;2-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. An every-2-week regimen of gemcitabine and paclitaxel was adapted for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) who had received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS. Forty-one patients with advanced or metastatic TCC who had received prior cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy were treated with an outpatient regimen of gemcitabine 2500-3000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. RESULTS. Forty of 41 patients had measurable disease. Response was observed in 24 patients (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 45-75%). Eleven (28%) achieved complete response, and 13 (33%) obtained partial response. Twenty of 25 patients (80%; 95% CI, 64-96%) who had been previously treated in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting responded versus 4 of 15 (27%; 95% Cl, 5-49%) in patients who received prior methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (M-VAC) for metastatic disease. The median duration of survival for patients given gemcitabine and paclitaxel after failing neoadjuvant or adjuvant M-VAC was 12 months (range, 2-43+), as compared with only 8 months (range, 2-28) for patients who had been treated after failure of prior therapy for metastatic disease. For all patients, the median duration of response was 6.4 months (range, 2-43.3+ months), and the median survival was 14.4 months (range, 2-43+). Thirteen patients (32%) developed World Health Organization Grade 3-4 neutropenia, with febrile neutropenia in 3 (7%) patients. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given to 10 (24%) patients. There was no Grade 3-4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS. The combination of gemcitabine and taxol in previously treated patients with recurrent TCC is highly effective and produces objective durable responses. This every-2-week schedule is a well tolerated outpatient regimen with minimal toxicity. (C) 2001 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2993 / 2998
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in patients who have received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy
    Kanai, Kunimitsu
    Kikuchi, Eiji
    Ohigashi, Takashi
    Miyajima, Akira
    Nakagawa, Ken
    Nakashima, Jun
    Oya, Mototsugu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 13 (06) : 510 - 514
  • [2] Gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in patients who have received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy
    Kunimitsu Kanai
    Eiji Kikuchi
    Takashi Ohigashi
    Akira Miyajima
    Ken Nakagawa
    Jun Nakashima
    Mototsugu Oya
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008, 13 : 510 - 514
  • [4] Salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and nedaplatin in patients with urothelial cancer who have received prior cisplatin-based therapy
    Shinohara, N
    Suzuki, S
    Abe, T
    Sazawa, A
    Harabayashi, T
    Nonomura, K
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 358 - 358
  • [5] Salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and nedaplatin in patients with urothelial cancer who had received prior cisplatin-based therapy
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    Harabayashi, Toru
    Suzuki, Shin
    Nagao, Kazuhiro
    Seki, Haruo
    Murakumo, Masashi
    Mitsuhashi, Kimiyoshi
    Demura, Takayoshi
    Nagamori, Satoshi
    Matsuyama, Hideyasu
    Naito, Katsusuke
    Nonomura, Katsuya
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 58 (03) : 402 - 407
  • [6] Salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and nedaplatin in patients with urothelial cancer who had received prior cisplatin-based therapy
    Nobuo Shinohara
    Toru Harabayashi
    Shin Suzuki
    Kazuhiro Nagao
    Haruo Seki
    Masashi Murakumo
    Kimiyoshi Mitsuhashi
    Takayoshi Demura
    Satoshi Nagamori
    Hideyasu Matsuyama
    Katsusuke Naito
    Katsuya Nonomura
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2006, 58 : 402 - 407
  • [7] Salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and nedaplatin in patients with urothelial cancer who had received prior cisplatin-based therapy.
    Shinohara, N.
    Harabayashi, T.
    Suzuki, S.
    Nagao, K.
    Nagamori, S.
    Matsuyama, H.
    Naito, K.
    Nonomura, K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 236S - 236S
  • [8] Efficacy and tolerability of Paclitaxel-Gemcitabine therapy for urothelial carcinoma in patients who have received prior platinum-based chemotherapy.
    Tomisaki, Ikko
    Minato, Akinori
    Fujimoto, Naohiro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [10] Chemotherapy with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with infiltrative transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium
    Ecke, T. K.
    Bartel, P.
    Theissig, F.
    Koch, S.
    Ruttloff, J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 220 - 220