The Impact of Power Distance Belief on Consumers? Brand Preferences

被引:13
|
作者
Wang, Jessie J. [1 ]
Lalwani, Ashok K. [2 ]
DelVecchio, Devon [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Farmer Sch Business, 800 E High St, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, 1309 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN USA
关键词
Power distance belief; Mass -market brand; Niche brand; Risk aversion; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CULTURAL-VALUES; PERCEIVED RISK; CROSS-COUNTRY; PRICE-QUALITY; MARKET SHARE; SELF; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.11.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Five lab studies and a field study explore how power distance belief (PDB) influences consumers' preference for mass-market versus niche brands, the underlying mechanisms, and boundary conditions. We find that high (vs. low) PDB consumers are more likely to prefer mass-market over niche brands because they tend to be risk averse, which in turn increases preference for widely used brands. Consequently, the relationship between PDB and brand preferences is mediated by risk aversion. Further, when product usage contexts are risky, low (but not high) PDB consumers' preference for mass-market brands increases, whereas offering an extended money-back guarantee increases high (but not low) PDB consumers' preference for niche brands. In addition, we find that when choosing service providers (versus choosing physical goods), low (but not high) PDB consumers are significantly more likely to prefer mass-market brands over niche brands. We conclude with the implications of these findings for marketers, such as for their segmentation and targeting endeavors. We also provide specific tools that marketers could use, both inside and outside the store, to influence consumers' preference for mass-market versus niche brands.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 823
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preference for partner or servant brand roles depends on consumers? power distance belief
    van Esch, Patrick
    Cui, Yuanyuan
    Sledge, April
    Das, Gopal
    Pala, Erol
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 162
  • [2] Price No Object!: The Impact of Power Distance Belief on Consumers' Price Sensitivity
    Lee, Hyejin
    Lalwani, Ashok K.
    Wang, Jessie J.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2020, 84 (06) : 113 - 129
  • [3] Power distance belief and brand personality evaluations
    Wang, Xuehua
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Fang, Xiang
    Jiang, Qingyun
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 84 : 89 - 99
  • [4] The impact of open branding on consumer brand attitudes: the moderating role of power distance belief
    Li, Yao
    Zhang, Cheng
    Zhou, Mi
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN INTERACTIVE MARKETING, 2024,
  • [5] Is Cinderella resurging? The impact of consumers' underdog disposition on brand preferences: Underdog brand biography and brand status as moderators
    Kao, Danny Tengti
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 14 (05) : 307 - 316
  • [6] A Measure of the Relative Preferences of Consumers in the Brand Origin
    Zhang Yuntang
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 CHINA MARKETING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (WEB CONFERENCING): MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT IN THE DIGITAL AGE, 2020, : 955 - 965
  • [7] Analysis of The Factors Affecting The Consumers' Preferences as for Brand Communication And Brand Equity
    Pirtini, Serdar
    Atalik, Ozlem
    Aygun, Guray
    ISTANBUL UNIVERSITESI ILETISIM FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2006, (27): : 125 - 136
  • [8] Can brand experience shorten consumers' psychological distance toward the brand? The effect of brand experience on consumers' construallevel
    Kim, Dong Hoo
    Song, Doori
    JOURNAL OF BRAND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (03) : 255 - 267
  • [9] Effect of downward line extension on consumers' purchase intentions: power distance belief as a moderator
    He, Yue
    Mo, Zan
    Fu, Huijian
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCT AND BRAND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 33 (02): : 207 - 219
  • [10] Culture Matters: The Impract of Power-Distance Belief on Consumers' Impulsive Buying Tendency
    Zhang, Yinlong
    Mittal, Vikas
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL 35, 2008, 35 : 643 - 643