Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold

被引:33
|
作者
Lee, Won Hee [4 ]
Lisanby, Sarah H. [5 ]
Laine, Andrew F. [6 ]
Peterchev, Angel V. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[6] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Electric field model; electroconvulsive therapy; finite element method; magnetic resonance imaging; motor threshold; nonhuman primate; transcranial electric stimulation; MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION; DIPOLE ESTIMATION ERRORS; REALISTIC HEAD MODELS; EEG SOURCE ANALYSIS; ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY; WHITE-MATTER; MESH GENERATION; SEIZURE THERAPY; ANISOTROPIC CONDUCTIVITIES; RESONANCE IMAGES;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2015.2425406
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a pipeline for realistic head models of nonhuman primates (NHPs) for simulations of non-invasive brain stimulation, and use these models together with empirical threshold measurements to demonstrate that the models capture individual anatomical variability. Methods: Based on structural MRI data, we created models of the electric field (E-field) induced by right unilateral (RUL) electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in four rhesus macaques. Individual motor threshold (MT) was measured with transcranial electric stimulation (TES) administered through the RUL electrodes in the same subjects. Results: The interindividual anatomical differences resulted in 57% variation in median E-field strength in the brain at fixed stimulus current amplitude. Individualization of the stimulus current by MT reduced the E-field variation in the target motor area by 27%. There was significant correlation between the measured MT and the ratio of simulated electrode current and E-field strength (r(2) = 0.95, p = 0.026). Exploratory analysis revealed significant correlations of this ratio with anatomical parameters including of the superior electrode-to-cortex distance, vertex-to-cortex distance, and brain volume (r(2) > 0.96, p < 0.02). The neural activation threshold was estimated to be 0.45 +/- 0.07 V/cm for 0.2-ms stimulus pulse width. Conclusion: These results suggest that our individual-specific NHP E-field models appropriately capture individual anatomical variability relevant to the dosing of TES/ECT. These findings are exploratory due to the small number of subjects. Significance: This study can contribute insight in NHP studies of ECT and other brain stimulation interventions, help link the results to clinical studies, and ultimately lead to more rational brain stimulation dosing paradigms.
引用
收藏
页码:2095 / 2105
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anatomical Variability Predicts Individual Differences in Transcranial Electric Stimulation Motor Threshold
    Lee, Won Hee
    Lisanby, Sarah H.
    Laine, Andrew F.
    Peterchev, Angel V.
    2013 35TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2013, : 815 - 818
  • [2] Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates
    Alexander Opitz
    Arnaud Falchier
    Chao-Gan Yan
    Erin M. Yeagle
    Gary S. Linn
    Pierre Megevand
    Axel Thielscher
    Ross Deborah A.
    Michael P. Milham
    Ashesh D. Mehta
    Charles E. Schroeder
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [3] Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates
    Opitz, Alexander
    Falchier, Arnaud
    Yan, Chao-Gan
    Yeagle, Erin M.
    Linn, Gary S.
    Megevand, Pierre
    Thielscher, Axel
    Ross, Deborah A.
    Milham, Michael P.
    Mehta, Ashesh D.
    Schroeder, Charles E.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [4] A semi-automated pipeline for finite element modeling of electric field induced in nonhuman primates by transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Goswami, Neerav
    Shen, Michael
    Gomez, Luis J.
    Dannhauer, Moritz
    Sommer, Marc A.
    V. Peterchev, Angel
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2024, 408
  • [5] Motor evoked potential latency, motor threshold and electric field measurements as indices of transcranial magnetic stimulation depth
    Roth, Yiftach
    Pell, Gaby S.
    Zangen, Abraham
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (02) : 255 - 258
  • [6] Predicting the hotspot location and motor threshold prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation using electric field modelling
    Matilainen, Noora
    Kataja, Juhani
    Laakso, Ilkka
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (01):
  • [7] Reply to "Motor evoked potential latency, motor threshold and electric field measurements as indices of transcranial magnetic stimulation depth"
    Fadini, Tommaso
    Matthaeus, Lars
    Rothkegel, Holger
    Sommer, Martin
    Tergau, Frithjof
    Schweikard, Achim
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (02) : 258 - 259
  • [8] Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold
    Danner, Nils
    Julkunen, Petro
    Kononen, Mervi
    Saisanen, Laura
    Nurkkala, Jouko
    Karhu, Jari
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2008, 174 (01) : 116 - 122
  • [9] The influence of white matter lesions on the electric field in transcranial electric stimulation
    Kalloch, Benjamin
    Weise, Konstantin
    Lampe, Leonie
    Bazin, Pierre-Louis
    Villringer, Arno
    Hlawitschka, Mario
    Sehm, Bernhard
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2022, 35
  • [10] The influence of white matter lesions on the electric field in transcranial electric stimulation
    Kalloch, Benjamin
    Weise, Konstantin
    Lampe, Leonie
    Bazin, Pierre -Louis
    Villringer, Arno
    Hlawitschka, Mario
    Sehm, Bernhard
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2022, 35