Know when to run, know when to hide: can behavioral differences explain the divergent invasion success of two sympatric lizards?

被引:65
|
作者
Chapple, David G. [1 ]
Simmonds, Sarah M. [1 ]
Wong, Bob B. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2011年 / 1卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Exploratory behavior; introduction process; invasion ecology; Lampropholis; propagule pressure; social tendency; LAMPROPHOLIS-DELICATA; PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC DIVERGENCE; PROPAGULE PRESSURE; GARDEN SKINK; NEW-ZEALAND; DISPERSAL; BOLDNESS; SPREAD; SIZE; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.22
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Invasive species represent a select subset of organisms that have successfully transitioned through each stage of the introduction process (transportation, establishment, and spread). Although there is a growing realization that behavior plays a critical role in invasion success, few studies have focused on the initial stages of introduction. We examined whether differences in the grouping tendencies and exploratory behavior of two sympatric lizard species could contribute to their divergent invasion success. While the nondirected activity of the two species did not differ, the invasive delicate skink(Lampropholis delicata) was found to be more exploratory than the congeneric noninvasive garden skink (L. guichenoti), which enabled it to more effectively locate novel environments and basking site resources. The delicate skink also exhibited a greater tendency to hide, which may act to enhance its probability of ensnarement in freight and cargo and decrease its likelihood of detection during transit. The grouping tendencies of the two species did not differ. Together, our results suggest that while the two species have an equivalent "opportunity" for unintentional human-assisted transportation, several pre-existing behavioral traits may enhance the success of the delicate skink in negotiating the initial stages of the introduction process, and subsequent post-establishment spread.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 289
页数:12
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Can behaviour explain invasion success? A comparison between sympatric invasive and native lizards
    Damas-Moreira, Isabel
    Riley, Julia L.
    Harris, D. James
    Whiting, Martin J.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 151 : 195 - 202
  • [2] You can't explain something when you don't even know what it is
    Burns, Taylor
    Reicher, Steve
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 24 (10) : 723 - 725
  • [3] When I say ... the knowledge paradox: the more I know, the less I can clearly explain
    Goldberg, Harry
    Hanlon, Caitlin
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 53 (01) : 13 - 14
  • [4] I Know This Looks Bad, But I Can Explain: Understanding When AI Should Explain Actions In Human-AI Teams
    Zhang, Rui
    Flathmann, Christopher
    Musick, Geoff
    Schelble, Beau
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Knijnenburg, Bart
    Duan, Wen
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [5] On "success" in applied environmental research - What is it, how can it be achieved, and how does one know when it has been achieved?
    Cooke, Steven J.
    Rytwinski, Trina
    Taylor, Jessica J.
    Nyboer, Elizabeth A.
    Nguyen, Vivian M.
    Bennett, Joseph R.
    Young, Nathan
    Aitken, Susan
    Auld, Graeme
    Lane, John-Francis
    Prior, Kent A.
    Smokorowski, Karen E.
    Smith, Paul A.
    Jacob, Aerin L.
    Browne, David R.
    Blais, Jules M.
    Kerr, Jeremy T.
    Ormeci, Banu
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Burn, Christopher R.
    Buxton, Rachel T.
    Orihel, Diane M.
    Vermaire, Jesse C.
    Murray, Dennis L.
    Simon, Patrice
    Edwards, Kate A.
    Clarke, John
    Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.
    Gregory-Eaves, Irene
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Smol, John P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2020, 28 (04): : 357 - 372