Classification Accuracy of MMPI-2 Validity Scales in the Detection of Pain-Related Malingering A Known-Groups Study

被引:35
|
作者
Bianchini, Kevin J. [1 ]
Etherton, Joseph L. [2 ]
Greve, Kevin W. [1 ]
Heinly, Matthew T.
Meyers, John E.
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, Jefferson Neurobehav Grp, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
[2] Loyola Univ New Orleans, Jefferson Neurobehav Grp, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
chronic pain; malingering; MMPI-2; somatization; psychological assessment; spine surgery;
D O I
10.1177/1073191108317341
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2nd edition (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) validity indicators in the detection of malingering in clinical patients with chronic pain using a hybrid clinical-known groups/simulator design. The sample consisted of patients without financial incentive (n = 23), nonmalingering patients with financial incentive ( n = 34), patients definitively determined to be malingering based on published criteria ( n = 32), and college students asked to simulate pain-related disability ( n = 26). The MMPI-2 validity scales differentiated malingerers from nonmalingerers with a high degree of accuracy. Hypochondriasis and Hysteria were also effective. For all variables except Scale L, more extreme scores were associated with higher specificity. This study demonstrates that the MMPI-2 is capable of differentiating intentional exaggeration from the effects on symptom report of chronic pain, genuine psychological disturbance, and concurrent stress associated with pursuing a claim in a medico-legal context.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 449
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条