Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size.

被引:134
|
作者
Liberman, L [1 ]
Mason, G [1 ]
Morris, EA [1 ]
Dershaw, DD [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Breast Imaging Sect, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; breast imaging; MRI; oncologic imaging;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.04.1707
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of lesion size on the positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy in MRI-detected breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review was performed of 666 consecutive nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions that had MRI-guided localization. MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5-T magnet. Lesions were measured by the interpreting radiologist before biopsy. Malignancy rate versus lesion size was determined. RESULTS. The median MRI lesion size was I cm (range, 0.3-7.0 cm). Malignancy was present in 149/666 (22%) lesions, of which 80 (54%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 66 (44%) were invasive cancer, and three (2%) were lymphoma. The frequency of malignancy increased significantly (p = 0.0005) with lesion size, with malignancy found in one (3%) of 37 lesions less than 5 mm, 44 (17%) of 254 lesions 5-9 mm, 37 (25%) of 151 lesions 10-14 mm, 21 (28%) of 74 lesions 15-19 mm, and 46 (31%) of 150 lesions 20 mm or larger. Lesions less than 5 mm accounted for 37 (6%) of 666 lesions that had a biopsy and one (< 1%) of 149 cancers (one DCIS). Among lesions less than 10 mm, the likelihood of malignancy was highest in postmenopausal women (22% malignant) and in the extent of disease setting (22% malignant), and lowest in premenopausal women (10% malignant) and in the high-risk screening setting (10% malignant). CONCLUSION. The PPV of biopsy for lesions identified at breast MRI using a 1.5-T magnet significantly increased with increasing lesion size. Biopsy is rarely necessary for lesions smaller than 5 mm because of their low (3%) likelihood of cancer. Further work is needed to develop an algorithm that uses size in addition to other patient and lesion factors to guide biopsy recommendations for MRI-detected breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 430
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size
    Liberman, L
    Mason, GE
    Morris, EA
    Dershaw, DD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 59 - 59
  • [2] MRI - Does the size of a breast lesion detected by MRI influence its positive predictive value of malignancy?
    Liberman, L.
    Mason, G.
    Morris, E. A.
    Dershaw, D. D.
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2006, 16 (02) : 139 - 140
  • [3] Does size matter? Likelihood of cancer in MRI-detected lesions less than 5 mm
    Van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    Ikeda, Debra M.
    Daniel, Bruce L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (06) : W571 - W571
  • [4] Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: Features and positive predictive value
    Liberman, L
    Morris, EA
    Lee, MJY
    Kaplan, JB
    LaTrenta, LR
    Menell, JH
    Abramson, AF
    Dashnaw, SM
    Ballon, DJ
    Dershaw, DD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (01) : 171 - 178
  • [5] Predictive detection areas for identifying additional MRI-detected breast lesions on second-look ultrasonography
    Tanaka, Akie
    Yamada, Atsushi
    Umeda, Tomoko
    Kaneko, Chiaki
    Shimizu, Tomoharu
    Naka, Shigeyuki
    Tani, Tohru
    Tani, Masaji
    SURGERY TODAY, 2017, 47 (11) : 1321 - 1330
  • [6] Predictive detection areas for identifying additional MRI-detected breast lesions on second-look ultrasonography
    Akie Tanaka
    Atsushi Yamada
    Tomoko Umeda
    Chiaki Kaneko
    Tomoharu Shimizu
    Shigeyuki Naka
    Tohru Tani
    Masaji Tani
    Surgery Today, 2017, 47 : 1321 - 1330
  • [7] MRI-Detected Suspicious Breast Lesions: Predictive Values of Kinetic Features Measured by Computer-Aided Evaluation
    Wang, Lilian C.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    Peacock, Sue
    Lehman, Constance D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (03) : 826 - 831
  • [8] Can we predict lesion detection rates in second-look ultrasound of MRI-detected breast lesions? A systematic analysis
    Bumberger, Alexander
    Clauser, Paola
    Kolta, Michael
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Bernathova, Maria
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Pinker, Katja
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 113 : 96 - 100
  • [9] Lesion Size Measured on MRI Does Not Accurately Reflect Arthroscopic Measurement in Talar Osteochondral Lesions
    Yasui, Youichi
    Hannon, Charles P.
    Fraser, Ethan J.
    Ackermann, Jakob
    Boakye, Lorraine
    Ross, Keir A.
    Duke, Gavin L.
    Shimozono, Yoshiharu
    Kennedy, John G.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (02):
  • [10] Does size matter? A review of screen-detected microcalcifications seen at breast screening assessment
    LIG Haigh
    Breast Cancer Research, 10