Risk of cancer following primary total hip replacement or primary resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a retrospective cohort study in Scotland

被引:27
|
作者
Brewster, D. H. [1 ]
Stockton, D. L. [1 ]
Reekie, A. [1 ]
Ashcroft, G. P. [2 ]
Howie, C. R. [3 ]
Porter, D. E. [3 ]
Black, R. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] NHS Natl Serv Scotland, Informat Serv Div, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Orthopaed, Foresterhill AB25 2ZD, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
arthroplasty; cohort studies; hip prosthesis; medical record linkage; neoplasms; risk; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; NORDIC COHORTS; NATIONWIDE; JOINT; REGISTRY; LINKAGE;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2013.129
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Release and dispersion of particles arising from corrosion and wear of total hip arthroplasty (THA) components has raised concerns about a possible increased risk of cancer. Concerns have been heightened by a recent revival in the use of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip prostheses. Methods: From a linked database of hospital discharge, cancer registration, and mortality records, we selected a cohort of patients who underwent primary THA (1990-2009) or primary resurfacing arthroplasty (mainly 2000-2009) in Scotland, with follow-up to the end of 2010. Available operation codes did not enable us to distinguish MoM THAs. Indirectly standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for selected cancers with standardisation for age, sex, deprivation, and calendar period. Results: The study cohort included 71 990 patients yielding 547 001 person-years at risk (PYAR) and 13 946 cancers diagnosed during follow-up. For the total period of observation combined, the risks of all cancers (SIR: 1.05; 95% CI: confidence interval 1.04-1.07), prostate cancer (SIR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14), and multiple myeloma (SIR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06-1.41) were increased. These modest increases in risk emerged in the context of effectively multiple tests of statistical significance, and may reflect inadequate adjustment for confounding factors. For 1317 patients undergoing primary resurfacing arthroplasty between 2000 and 2009 (PYAR = 5698), the SIR for all cancers (n = 39) was 1.23 (95% CI: 0.87-1.68). Conclusion: In the context of previous research, these results do not suggest a major cause for concern. However, the duration of follow-up of patients receiving recently introduced, new-generation MoM prostheses is too short to rule out a genuinely increased risk of cancer entirely.
引用
收藏
页码:1883 / 1890
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk of cancer following primary total hip replacement or primary resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a retrospective cohort study in Scotland
    D H Brewster
    D L Stockton
    A Reekie
    G P Ashcroft
    C R Howie
    D E Porter
    R J Black
    British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108 : 1883 - 1890
  • [2] Conversion of hip resurfacing to total hip arthroplasty: is the outcome closer to primary or revision total hip arthroplasty?
    Mutschler, Marion
    Massazza, Allegra
    Antoniadis, Alexander
    Palazzuolo, Michele
    Wegrzyn, Julien
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2024, 110 (08)
  • [3] Primary Total Hip Replacement Versus Hip Resurfacing Hospital Considerations
    Ward, William G.
    Carter, Christina J.
    Barone, Marisa
    Jinnah, Riyaz
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2011, 69 : S95 - S97
  • [4] The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men
    Kimona Issa
    Amanda Palich
    Tiffany Tatevossian
    Bhaveen H Kapadia
    Qais Naziri
    Michael A Mont
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [5] The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men
    Issa, Kimona
    Palich, Amanda
    Tatevossian, Tiffany
    Kapadia, Bhaveen H.
    Naziri, Qais
    Mont, Michael A.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [6] The subjective hip value: a retrospective validation study in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Kevin Y. Heo
    Andrew Fuqua
    Jason Shah
    Omar Syed
    Joseph Song
    Emilie C. Collins
    Jesse Seilern Und Aspang
    Ajay Premkumar
    Jacob M. Wilson
    Arthroplasty, 7 (1)
  • [7] Risk factors for dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty
    Suva, Domizio L.
    Lubbeke, Anne
    Zimmermann, Doris
    Peter, Robin
    Hoffmeyer, Pierre
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142 : S19 - S19
  • [8] The Outcomes of Cormet(TM) Hip Resurfacing Compared to Standard Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty\
    Costa, Christopher R.
    Johnson, Aaron J.
    Naziri, Qais
    Mont, Michael A.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2011, 69 : S12 - S15
  • [9] Outpatient Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Is a Safe Alternative to Inpatient Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched-Cohort Analysis Study
    Ng, Mitchell K.
    Razi, Afshin
    Golub, Ivan J.
    wong, Che Hang Jason
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    Mont, Michael A.
    SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL-INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SURGERY AND SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 39
  • [10] A Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not a Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Raiford, Mattie E.
    Barra, Matthew F.
    Myers, Thomas G.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 29 (03)