On the Relation between Institutional Statuses and Technical Artifacts: A Proposed Taxonomy of Social Kinds

Technical artifacts do not seem particularly continuous with institutional statuses. If statuses are defined in terms of their constitutive rules, as Searle maintains, then disassociation is always possible - someone or something can satisfy those rules without being able to realize the functional effects that are associated with that status. The gap between technical artifacts and Searlean statuses suggests the possibility of an additional social kind, which I call, following Muhammad Ali Khalidi, a 'real social kind'. However, the placement of real social kinds between technical artifacts and statuses recommends a reconfiguration of Khalidi's most abstract characterization of the notion. This reconfiguration also lends support to his surprising claim that money is a real social kind.