Size-assortative choice and mate availability influences hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans)

被引:24
|
作者
Hinton, Joseph W. [1 ]
Gittleman, John L. [2 ]
van Manen, Frank T. [3 ]
Chamberlain, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, Bozeman, MT USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2018年 / 8卷 / 08期
关键词
assortative mating; body size; Canis latrans; Canis rufus; coyote; hybridization; monogamous breeding; red wolf; reproductive barriers; space use; EASTERN NORTH-CAROLINA; GOPHERS GENUS GEOMYS; EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY; HYBRID ZONE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; BREEDING PAIRS; CONTACT ZONES; WOLF; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.3950
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic hybridization of historically isolated taxa has become a primary conservation challenge for many imperiled species. Indeed, hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans) poses a significant challenge to red wolf recovery. We considered seven hypotheses to assess factors influencing hybridization between red wolves and coyotes via pair-bonding between the two species. Because long-term monogamy and defense of all-purpose territories are core characteristics of both species, mate choice has long-term consequences. Therefore, red wolves may choose similar-sized mates to acquire partners that behave similarly to themselves in the use of space and diet. We observed multiple factors influencing breeding pair formation by red wolves and found that most wolves paired with similar-sized conspecifics and wolves that formed congeneric pairs with nonwolves (coyotes and hybrids) were mostly female wolves, the smaller of the two sexes. Additionally, we observed that lower red wolf abundance relative to nonwolves and the absence of helpers increased the probability that wolves consorted with nonwolves. However, successful pairings between red wolves and nonwolves were associated with wolves that maintained small home ranges. Behaviors associated with territoriality are energetically demanding and behaviors (e.g., aggressive interactions, foraging, and space use) involved in maintaining territories are influenced by body size. Consequently, we propose the hypothesis that size disparities between consorting red wolves and coyotes influence positive assortative mating and may represent a reproductive barrier between the two species. We offer that it may be possible to maintain wild populations of red wolves in the presence of coyotes if management strategies increase red wolf abundance on the landscape by mitigating key threats, such as human-caused mortality and hybridization with coyotes. Increasing red wolf abundance would likely restore selection pressures that increase mean body and home-range sizes of red wolves and decrease hybridization rates via reduced occurrence of congeneric pairs.
引用
收藏
页码:3927 / 3940
页数:14
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Using faecal DNA sampling and GIS to monitor hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans)
    Adams, JR
    Kelly, BT
    Waits, LP
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2003, 12 (08) : 2175 - 2186
  • [2] Biological Correlates with Degree of Introgressive Hybridization between Coyotes Canis latrans and Wolves Canis sp. in Pennsylvania, USA
    Pfeffer, Erin
    Barth, Kelsey
    Bitsko, Lucas
    Gibson, Natalie
    Roth, Kim
    Butler, Eric
    Ramakrishnan, Uma
    Buonaccorsi, Vincent
    AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 2022, 188 (02): : 199 - 211
  • [3] Conditions for sexual interactions between wild Grey Wolves, Canis lupus, and Coyotes, Canis latrans
    Thiel, Richard P.
    CANADIAN FIELD-NATURALIST, 2006, 120 (01): : 27 - 30
  • [4] Behavioral interactions between coyotes, Canis latrans, and wolves, Canis lupus, at Ungulate carcasses in Southwestern Montana
    Atwood, Todd C.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2006, 66 (03) : 390 - 394
  • [5] Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans)
    Ward, Jennifer N.
    Hinton, Joseph W.
    Johannsen, Kristina L.
    Karlin, Melissa L.
    Miller, Karl, V
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [6] HELMINTHS IN COYOTES (CANIS-LATRANS SAY), WOLVES (CANIS-LUPUS L) AND RED FOXES (VULPES-VULPES L) OF SOUTHWESTERN MANITOBA
    SAMUEL, WM
    RAMALINGAM, S
    CARBYN, LN
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1978, 56 (12) : 2614 - 2617
  • [7] When carnivores collide: a review of studies exploring the competitive interactions between bobcats Lynx rufus and coyotes Canis latrans
    Dyck, Marissa A.
    Wyza, Eileen
    Popescu, Viorel D.
    MAMMAL REVIEW, 2022, 52 (01) : 52 - 66
  • [8] Effects of Inbreeding on Reproductive Success, Performance, Litter Size, and Survival in Captive Red Wolves (Canis rufus)
    Rabon, David R., Jr.
    Waddell, William
    ZOO BIOLOGY, 2010, 29 (01) : 36 - 49
  • [9] Revisiting the concept of behavior patterns in animal behavior with an example from food-caching sequences in Wolves (Canis lupus), Coyotes (Canis latrans), and Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes)
    Gadbois, Simon
    Sievert, Olivia
    Reeve, Catherine
    Harrington, F. H.
    Fentress, J. C.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2015, 110 : 3 - 14
  • [10] Assessing the prevalence of hybridization between sympatric Canis species surrounding the red wolf (Canis rufus) recovery area in North Carolina
    Bohling, Justin H.
    Waits, Lisette P.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2011, 20 (10) : 2142 - 2156