Standard finite element techniques for efficient stress analysis of adhesive joints

被引:36
|
作者
Castagnetti, D. [1 ]
Dragoni, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Modena, Dipartimento Sci & Metodi Ingn, I-41100 Modena, Italy
关键词
Finite element stress analysis; Joint design; Lap shear; BONDED JOINTS; VISCOELASTIC ANALYSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.005
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The piper documents ongoing research in the field of stress analysis of adhesive bonded joints and aims at developing efficient and accurate finite element techniques for the simplified calculation of adhesive stresses. Goal of the research is to avoid the major limitations of existing methods, in particular their dependency oil special elements or procedures not supported by general purpose analysis packages. Two simplified computational methods, relying on standard modelling tools and regular finite elements are explored and compared with the outcome of theoretical Solutions retrieved from the literature and with the results of full, computationally intensive, finite element analyses. Both methods reproduce the adherends by means of structural elements (beams or plates) and the adhesive by a single layer of solid elements (plane-stress or bricks). The difference between the two methods resides in the thickness and in the elastic properties given to the adhesive layer. In one case, the adhesive thickness is extended up to the midplane of the adherends and its elastic modulus is proportionally increased. In the other case. the adhesive layer is maintained at its true properties and the connection to the adherends is enforced by standard kinematic constraints. The benchmark analyses start from 2D single lap joints and are then extended to 3D configurations, including a wall-bonded square bracket undergoing cantilever loading. One of the two simplified methods investigated provides accurate results with minimal computational effort for both 2D and 3D configurations. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 135
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient Post-elastic Analysis of Bonded Joints by Standard Finite Element Techniques
    Castagnetti, D.
    Dragoni, E.
    Spaggiari, A.
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (10-11) : 1459 - 1476
  • [2] A three-dimensional finite element model for stress analysis of adhesive joints
    Gonçalves, J.P.M.
    De Moura, M.F.S.F.
    De Castro, P.M.S.T.
    1600, Elsevier Ltd (22):
  • [3] Finite-element stress analysis of double-lap adhesive joints
    Sawa, T
    Suga, H
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 10 (12) : 1255 - 1271
  • [4] Finite-element stress analysis of double-lap adhesive joints
    Sawa, Toshiyuki
    Suga, Hidekazu
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 1996, 10 (12): : 1255 - 1271
  • [5] A three-dimensional finite element model for stress analysis of adhesive joints
    Gonçalves, JPM
    de Moura, MFSF
    de Castro, PMST
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2002, 22 (05) : 357 - 365
  • [6] Nonlinear viscoelastic finite element analysis of adhesive joints
    Roy, S.
    Reddy, J.N.
    Tire Science and Technology, 1988, 16 (03) : 146 - 170
  • [7] Efficient stress analysis of adhesively bonded joints by finite elements techniques
    Castagnetti, Davide
    Dragoni, Eugenio
    Proceedings of the 8th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Vol 3, 2006, : 817 - 825
  • [8] Numerical analysis of adhesive joints using Finite Element Method
    Hasan, M.
    Exner, J.
    Kirschey, Harald
    Helwig, F.
    Kukulies, U.
    Romanos, G.
    Hackl, K.
    WELLE-NABE-VERBINDUNGEN: GESTALTUNG - FERTIGUNG - ANWENDUNGEN MIT FACHAUSSTELLUNG, 2012, 2012, 2176 : 95 - 104
  • [9] STRESS ANALYSIS OF ADHESIVE SCARF JOINTS OF STEEL PLATES IN PURE BENDING AND CONTRACTION OF ADHESIVE BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD.
    Suzuki, Yasuaki
    1985, (28):
  • [10] Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution in bi-adhesive bonded joints
    Kong, Fan-Rong
    You, Min
    Zheng, Xiao-Ling
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2008, 84 (02): : 105 - 124