Contact lens-induced corneal peripheral swelling differences with extended wear

被引:14
|
作者
Martin, Raul [1 ,2 ]
de Juan, Victoria [2 ]
Rodriguez, Guadalupe [2 ]
Fonseca, Soraya [2 ]
Martin, Sofia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Sch Optometry, Dept Phys TAO, Valladolid, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, IOBA Eye Inst, Valladolid, Spain
关键词
extended wear; oxygen transmissibility; central and peripheral corneal swelling; hydrogel contact lens;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0b013e318172fc2c
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare central and peripheral corneal swelling with high-Dk (lotrafilcon Lambda) and low-Dk (etafilcon A) contact lenses (CLs) during extended wear (EW). Methods: Corneal thickness was measured in 5 cforneal location (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal) with Orbscan II pachymetry 1 week before the wearing of CLs and after 1 week of EW. High-Dk (lotrafilcon A) and low-Dk (etafilcon A) soft CLs were randomly fitted for EW in the right and left eyes of 20 subjects with normal ocular health. Orbscan was also performed before CL removal after 3 and 7 days of EW. Results: Ltrafilcon A induced a lower percentage of corneal swelling in all 5 corneal locations than etafilcon A (P < 0.05, paired t test). Lotrafilcon A swelling percentages were as follows: central (1.67% +/- 2.22%) (2.04% +/- 3.25%), inferior (1.38% +/- 1.74%), nasal (1.50% +/- 2.00%), and temporal (1.27% +/- 1.47%) Etafilcon A swelling percentages were as follows: central (4.98% +/- 3.07%), superior (6.62% +/- 8.39%), inferior (5.24% +/- 5.54%), nasal (3.41% +/- 3.14%), and temporal (4.46% +/- 3.32%). Differences between the central and peripheral corneal swelling during EW of both types of lenses were not significant (P > 0.05. repeatedly measures analysis of variance). Conclusions: Central and peripheral corneal thickness increase more with etafilcon A than with lotrafilcon A during EW as measured by Orbscan pachymetry.
引用
收藏
页码:976 / 979
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contact Lens-Induced Corneal Peripheral Swelling: Orbscan Repeatability
    Martin, Raul
    de Juan, Victoria
    Rodriguez, Guadalupe
    Fonseca, Soraya
    Martin, Sofia
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2009, 86 (04) : 340 - 349
  • [2] Endothelial cell density and contact lens-induced corneal swelling
    Erickson, P
    Doughty, MJ
    Comstock, TL
    Cullen, AP
    CORNEA, 1998, 17 (02) : 152 - 157
  • [3] Contact lens-induced peripheral ulcers with extended wear of disposable hydrogel lenses: Histopathologic observations on the nature and type of corneal infiltrate
    Holden, BA
    Reddy, MK
    Sankaridurg, PR
    Buddi, R
    Sharma, S
    Willcox, MDP
    Sweeney, DF
    Rao, GN
    CORNEA, 1999, 18 (05) : 538 - 543
  • [4] CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL CORNEAL SWELLING ACCOMPANYING SOFT LENS EXTENDED WEAR
    BONANNO, JA
    POLSE, KA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1985, 62 (02): : 74 - 81
  • [5] CONTACT LENS-INDUCED CORNEAL WARPAGE
    MOBILIA, EF
    KENYON, KR
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINICS, 1986, 26 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [6] Constancy of the Orbscan acoustic factor to detect contact lens-induced corneal swelling
    Martin, Raul
    Nunez, Laura
    Sastre, Jesus
    de Juan, Victoria
    Rodriguez, Guadalupe
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2011, 94 (04) : 352 - 360
  • [7] Contact lens-induced corneal swelling and surface changes measured with the Orbscan II corneal topographer
    Moezzi, AM
    Fonn, D
    Simpson, TL
    Sorbara, L
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2004, 81 (03) : 189 - 193
  • [8] CORNEAL SWELLING CAUSED BY CONTACT LENS WEAR
    MANDELL, RB
    POLSE, KA
    FATT, I
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1970, 83 (01) : 3 - &
  • [9] CONTACT LENS-INDUCED CORNEAL EPITHELIAL INJURY
    BERGMANSON, JPG
    CHU, LWF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1982, 59 (06): : 500 - 506
  • [10] Not All Dry Eye in Contact Lens Wear Is Contact Lens-Induced
    Molina, Karen
    Graham, Andrew D.
    Yeh, Thao
    Lerma, Mariel
    Li, Wing
    Tse, Vivien
    Lin, Meng C.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 46 (04): : 214 - 222