Legal issues in sharing the benefits of biodiversity prospecting

被引:8
|
作者
Mays, T [1 ]
Mazan, KD [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI,OFF TECHNOL DEV,NIH,BETHESDA,MD 20892
关键词
biodiversity; intellectual property rights; indigenous rights; contracts;
D O I
10.1016/0378-8741(95)01352-0
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the US Government's principal agency for research on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer. A critical component of the Institute's mission is the identification and development of new and promising treatments for cancer and AIDS. For many years these efforts have included a program to investigate natural products for potential new therapeutic agents. In 1986, with the advent of new screening techniques, the National Cancer Institute stepped up its exploration of natural products and began world-wide collections of plants in tropical and subtropical regions. In recognition of the principles of the Biodiversity Treaty, NCI appreciates that continued access to the natural products of these countries depends on the Institute's ability to recognize the contributions of these source countries and their indigenous peoples, and to provide them adequate incentives to conserve their natural resources for the purposes of drug discovery. Accomplishing this goal presented several legal issues for the National Cancer Institute. As an agency of the US government, the NCI has an adjunct statutory mission to facilitate the transfer of technology developed through the Institute's programs into the private sector for further development and commercialization, and NCI operates under a national policy to use the patent system to transfer Federally supported research to the private domestic sector. Reliance on patent law may limit the Institute's ability to recognize the rights of source countries and their indigenous people and provide compensation for their contributions. However, other legal instruments, such as contracts, can serve as interim measures to provide compensation to source countries and indigenous populations. The National Cancer Institute's Letter of Collection agreement (LOG, formerly the 'Letter of Intent'), is an example of an alternative means that 'fills-in the gaps' created by patent law and through which source countries may share in the benefits of natural product development.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 102
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Legal issues in sharing the benefits of biodiversity prospecting - Discussion
    Aalbersberg, WGL
    Mazan, RD
    Soejarto, DD
    Farnsworth, NR
    Garcia, R
    McChesney, JD
    Cragg, GM
    Jato, J
    Sittenfeld, A
    JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 51 (1-3) : 102 - 105
  • [2] Sharing and reporting benefits from biodiversity research
    Marden, Emily
    Abbott, Richard J.
    Austerlitz, Frederic
    Ortiz-Barrientos, Daniel
    Baucom, Regina S.
    Bongaerts, Pim
    Bonin, Aurelie
    Bonneaud, Camille
    Browne, Luke
    Alex Buerkle, C.
    Caicedo, Ana L.
    Coltman, David W.
    Cruzan, Mitchell B.
    Davison, Angus
    DeWoody, J. Andrew
    Dumbrell, Alex J.
    Emerson, Brent C.
    Fountain-Jones, Nicholas M.
    Gillespie, Rosemary
    Giraud, Tatiana
    Hansen, Michael M.
    Hodgins, Kathryn A.
    Heuertz, Myriam
    Hirase, Shotaro
    Hooper, Rebecca
    Hohenlohe, Paul
    Kane, Nolan C.
    Kelley, Joanna L.
    Kinziger, Andrew P.
    McKenzie, Valerie J.
    Moreau, Corrie S.
    Nazareno, Alison G.
    Pelletier, Tara A.
    Pemberton, Josephine M.
    Qu, Yanhua
    Renaut, Sebastien
    Riginos, Cynthia
    Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, Naiara
    Rogers, Sean M.
    Russell, Jacob A.
    Schoville, Sean D.
    Shi, Suhua
    Smith, Megan
    Sork, Victoria L.
    Stone, Graham N.
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Videvall, Elin
    Waits, Lisette
    Warschefsky, Emily
    Wayne, Robert K.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2021, 30 (05) : 1103 - 1107
  • [3] Biodiversity prospecting and benefit-sharing: Perspectives from the field - Discussion
    Turner, DM
    Soejarto, DD
    JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 51 (1-3) : 15 - 15
  • [5] Equitable sharing of biodiversity benefits: Agreements on genetic resources
    Rosenthal, JP
    INVESTING IN BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: THE CAIRNS CONFERENCE, 1997, : 253 - 274
  • [6] Legal entities as a flexible tool in benefits sharing programs
    Huft, MJ
    ETHNOBIOLOGY AND BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 11 - 20
  • [7] Sharing the benefits of genetic resources:: From biodiversity to human genetics
    Schroeder, Doris
    Lasen-Diaz, Carolina
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (03) : 135 - 143
  • [8] Genomic knowledge sharing: A review of the ethical and legal issues
    Francis, Leslie P.
    APPLIED AND TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS, 2014, 3 (04): : 111 - 115
  • [9] Biodiversity prospecting: Lessons and prospects
    Moran, K
    King, SR
    Carlson, TJ
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2001, 30 : 505 - 526
  • [10] BIODIVERSITY PROMISES GREAT PROSPECTING
    FOX, JL
    BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 13 (06): : 544 - 545