Sensitivity of cirrus and mixed-phase clouds to the ice nuclei spectra in McRAS-AC: single column model simulations

被引:8
|
作者
Betancourt, R. Morales [1 ]
Lee, D. [2 ]
Oreopoulos, L.
Sud, Y. C.
Barahona, D. [3 ]
Nenes, A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] USRA Goddard Earth Sci Technol & Res, Columbia, MD 21044 USA
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, IM Syst Grp, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
STRATIFORM CLOUDS; MINERAL DUST; PART I; PARAMETERIZATION; NUCLEATION; AEROSOL; MICROPHYSICS; SCHEME; PRECIPITATION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.5194/acp-12-10679-2012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The salient features of mixed-phase and ice clouds in a GCM cloud scheme are examined using the ice nucleation parameterizations of Liu and Penner (LP) and Barahona and Nenes (BN). The performance of both parameterizations was assessed in the GEOS-5 AGCM using the McRAS-AC cloud microphysics framework in single column mode. Four dimensional assimilated data from the intensive observation period of ARM TWP-ICE campaign was used to drive the fluxes and lateral forcing. Simulation experiments were established to test the impact of each parameterization in the resulting cloud fields. Three commonly used IN spectra were utilized in the BN parameterization to describe the availability of IN for heterogeneous ice nucleation. The results showed large similarities in the cirrus cloud regime between all the schemes tested, in which ice crystal concentrations were within a factor of 10 regardless of the parameterization used. In mixed-phase clouds there were some persistent differences in cloud particle number concentration and size, as well as in cloud fraction, ice water mixing ratio, and ice water path. Contact freezing in the simulated mixed-phase clouds contributed to the effective transfer of liquid to ice, so that on average, the clouds were fully glaciated at T similar to 260 K, irrespective of the ice nucleation parameterization used. Comparison of simulated ice water path to available satellite derived observations were also performed, finding that all the schemes tested with the BN parameterization predicted average values of IWP within +/-15% of the observations.
引用
收藏
页码:10679 / 10692
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] The Effect of Ice Nuclei Efficiency on Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds from Large-Eddy Simulations
    Fu, Shizuo
    Xue, Huiwen
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2017, 74 (12) : 3901 - 3913
  • [2] Sensitivity studies of the importance of dust ice nuclei for the indirect aerosol effect on stratiform mixed-phase clouds
    Lohmann, U
    Diehl, K
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2006, 63 (03) : 968 - 982
  • [3] Impacts of secondary ice production on Arctic mixed-phase clouds based on ARM observations and CAM6 single-column model simulations
    Zhao, Xi
    Liu, Xiaohong
    Phillips, Vaughan T. J.
    Patade, Sachin
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 21 (07) : 5685 - 5703
  • [4] Minimalist model of ice microphysics in mixed-phase stratiform clouds
    Yang, Fan
    Ovchinnikov, Mikhail
    Shaw, Raymond A.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (14) : 3756 - 3760
  • [5] Cloud condensation nuclei as a modulator of ice processes in Arctic mixed-phase clouds
    Lance, S.
    Shupe, M. D.
    Feingold, G.
    Brock, C. A.
    Cozic, J.
    Holloway, J. S.
    Moore, R. H.
    Nenes, A.
    Schwarz, J. P.
    Spackman, J. R.
    Froyd, K. D.
    Murphy, D. M.
    Brioude, J.
    Cooper, O. R.
    Stohl, A.
    Burkhart, J. F.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2011, 11 (15) : 8003 - 8015
  • [6] Implementation of a comprehensive ice crystal formation parameterization for cirrus and mixed-phase clouds in the EMAC model (based on MESSy 2.53)
    Bacer, Sara
    Sullivan, Sylvia C.
    Karydis, Vlassis A.
    Barahona, Donifan
    Kraemer, Martina
    Nenes, Athanasios
    Tost, Holger
    Tsimpidi, Alexandra P.
    Lelieveld, Jos
    Pozzer, Andrea
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 11 (10) : 4021 - 4041
  • [7] Simulating mixed-phase Arctic stratus clouds: sensitivity to ice initiation mechanisms
    Sednev, I.
    Menon, S.
    McFarquhar, G.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2009, 9 (14) : 4747 - 4773
  • [8] Partitioning the primary ice formation modes in large eddy simulations of mixed-phase clouds
    Hande, Luke B.
    Hoose, Corinna
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (22) : 14105 - 14118
  • [9] Sensitivity of single column model simulations of Arctic springtime clouds to different cloud cover and mixed phase cloud parameterizations
    Zhang, JH
    Lohmann, U
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D15)
  • [10] Sensitivity of precipitation formation to secondary ice production in winter orographic mixed-phase clouds
    Dedekind, Zane
    Lauber, Annika
    Ferrachat, Sylvaine
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 21 (19) : 15115 - 15134