Experimental evidence of multiple ecosystem services and disservices provided by ecological intensification in Mediterranean agro-ecosystems

被引:15
|
作者
Segre, Hila [1 ]
Segoli, Michal [2 ]
Carmel, Yohay [3 ]
Shwartz, Assaf [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Architecture & Town Planning, Haifa, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Mitrani Dept Desert Ecol, Jacob Blaustein Inst Desert Res, Midreshet Ben Gurion, Israel
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Haifa, Israel
关键词
biodiversity conservation; biological pest control; crop damage; edge effect; field margins; sustainable farming; weed control; yield; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; NATURAL ENEMIES; FIELD MARGINS; AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY; SEMINATURAL HABITATS; PEST-CONTROL; LANDSCAPE; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13713
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Intensifying agricultural production in sustainable ways is pivotal to increasing food production while reducing environmental impacts. Ecological intensification is based on managing organisms that provide services underlying crop production to simultaneously intensify agricultural production and increase biodiversity. However, few studies address the interactions and trade-offs between biodiversity, multiple ecosystem services and crop production. We experimentally quantified the effect of uncultivated field margins, a prominent practice of ecological intensification, on agricultural production, biodiversity, as well as on multiple ecosystem services and disservices, in an intensive Mediterranean agro-ecosystem. We used a split-plot design and sampled butterflies, rodent and arthropod pests, arthropod natural enemies (both parasitoids and predators), weeds, damage to crop and crop yield in different distances into the field in 3 tomato and 11 wheat crops along the growing season. Field margins increased natural enemy densities, reduced pest-damage to crop and consequently increased yield in tomato crops. Notably, we found that pest control by one predator species was dominant in the field centre, whereas parasitoid natural enemies were confined to the field edges. Pest control was more prominent in the late crop-stage compared to early season sampling and field margins increased weed control in tomato crops by reducing weed cover. Field margins increased natural enemy densities in wheat at the beginning of the season, but effects on arthropod pests were inconsistent. Field margins slightly increased weed cover, but had no impact on rodent densities and total yield. Butterfly abundance, but not richness, was positively affected by vegetated field margins. Synthesis and applications. Promoting ecological intensification requires a holistic approach that considers the complex relationships among ecological and economic aspects of agro-ecosystems. We found that ecologically intensified field margins provided pest and weed control in the highly intensive tomato crop, yet they increased weed cover in wheat, which could potentially restrict yields at the field scale. Farmers' guidelines should therefore consider the interactive effects of multiple services on a variety of crops. Moreover, biodiversity components that do not provide crop production services should be independently targeted (e.g. by sowing plants that provide food resources).
引用
收藏
页码:2041 / 2053
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Understanding, restoring, and regenerating ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems
    Kremen, Claire
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [2] Staging stewards of agro-ecosystems in the ecosystem services framework
    Rana, Kartika
    Goyal, Neha
    Sharma, Gyan Prakash
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 33 : 89 - 101
  • [3] Camera trap and questionnaire dataset on ecosystem services provided by small carnivores in agro-ecosystems in South Africa
    Williams, Samual T.
    Maree, Naudene
    Taylor, Peter
    Belmain, Steven R.
    Keith, Mark
    Swanepoel, Lourens H.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2018, 18 : 753 - 759
  • [4] Ecosystem services in new Zealand agro-ecosystems: A literature review
    van den Belt, Madan
    Blake, Daniella
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 9 : 115 - 132
  • [5] Towards an enhanced indication of provisioning ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems
    Claudia Bethwell
    Benjamin Burkhard
    Katrin Daedlow
    Claudia Sattler
    Moritz Reckling
    Peter Zander
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193
  • [6] Towards an enhanced indication of provisioning ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems
    Bethwell, Claudia
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Daedlow, Katrin
    Sattler, Claudia
    Reckling, Moritz
    Zander, Peter
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (SUPPL 1)
  • [7] Biodiversity and key ecosystem services as protection goal for agro-ecosystems in Europe
    Brock, Theo C. M.
    Schoonjans, Reinhilde
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [8] Afforestation, agricultural abandonment and intensification: Competing trajectories in semi-arid Mediterranean agro-ecosystems
    Nainggolan, Doan
    de Vente, Joris
    Boix-Fayos, Carolina
    Termansen, Mette
    Hubacek, Klaus
    Reed, Mark S.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 159 : 90 - 104
  • [9] Species-rich dung beetle communities buffer ecosystem services in perturbed agro-ecosystems
    Beynon, Sarah A.
    Mann, Darren J.
    Slade, Eleanor M.
    Lewis, Owen T.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2012, 49 (06) : 1365 - 1372
  • [10] Investigating the impacts of climate change on ecosystem services in UK agro-ecosystems: An application of the DPSIR framework
    Moss, Ellen D.
    Evans, Darren M.
    Atkins, Jonathan P.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 105