Occlusal comparison of hand-articulation versus digital articulation in orthognathic surgery

The aim of the present study was to develop measurement methods to evaluate occlusal differences in digitally-articulated and handarticulated models in final occlusal planning for orthognathic surgery. A total of 10 (five class II and five class III) previously treated orthognathic cases were analysed by three oral and maxillofacial surgeon investigators, creating a total of thirty cases. Investigators used physical models to create a preferred hand-held final occlusion, which were then scanned and saved utilising a Trios 3?? scanner (3Shape). Models were digitally disarticulated and sent back to investigators after a period of at least a month for digital articulation. Novel measurements of dental roll, pitch, and translational differences were performed by an independent engineer using Materialise 3-Matic?? software. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate translational differences, the effect of deformity, and inter-investigator variation. A mean (SD) translational difference of 1.58 mm (1.14) mm was seen between the thirty digital and hard-articulated cases analysed. Minimal difference was seen in roll and pitch between hand articulation and digital articulation. A significant translational difference was seen in class III cases compared with class II (p = 0.0006) but not in roll or pitch. There was no significant difference seen between investigators related to translation (p = 0.18), roll (p = 0.09), or pitch (p = 0.17). Digital articulation yielded similar results to hand held in this pilot study. Using measurement techniques described in larger cohorts, its accuracy can be validated using currently available technology. Crown Copyright ?? 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.