The Bankart Performance Metrics Combined With a Cadaveric Shoulder Create a Precise and Accurate Assessment Tool for Measuring Surgeon Skill

被引:40
|
作者
Angelo, Richard L. [1 ]
Ryu, Richard K. N. [2 ]
Pedowitz, Robert A. [3 ]
Gallagher, Anthony G. [4 ]
机构
[1] ProOrtho Clin, Kirkland, WA 98072 USA
[2] Ryu Hurvitz Orthoped Clin, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, ASSERT, Cork, Ireland
关键词
VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATION; OPERATING-ROOM; RESIDENTS; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; FEEDBACK; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2015.05.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine if previously validated performance metrics for an arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) coupled with a cadaveric shoulder are a valid assessment tool with the ability to discriminate between the performances of experienced and novice surgeons and to establish a proficiency benchmark for an ABR using a cadaveric shoulder. Methods: Ten master/associate master faculty from an Arthroscopy Association of North America Resident Course (experienced group) were compared with 12 postgraduate year 4 and postgraduate year 5 orthopaedic residents (novice group). Each group was instructed to perform a diagnostic arthroscopy and a 3 suture anchor Bankart repair on a cadaveric shoulder. The procedure was videotaped in its entirety and independently scored in blinded fashion by a pair of trained reviewers. Scoring was based on defined and previously validated metrics for an ABR and included steps, errors, "sentinel" (more serious) errors, and time. Results: The inter-rater reliability was 0.92. Novice surgeons made 50% more errors (5.86 v 2.95, P = .013), showed more performance variability (SD, 1.86 v 0.55), and took longer to perform the procedure (45.5 minutes v 25.9 minutes, P < .001). The greatest difference in errors related to suture delivery and management (exclusive of knot tying) (1.95 v 0.45, P = .024). Conclusions: The assessment tool composed of validated arthroscopic Bankart metrics coupled with a cadaveric shoulder accurately distinguishes the performance of experienced from novice orthopaedic surgeons. A benchmark based on the mean performance of the experienced group includes completion of a 3-anchor Bankart repair, and enacting no more than 3 total errors and 1 sentinel error. Clinical Relevance: Validated procedural metrics combined with the use of a cadaveric shoulder can be used to assess the performance of an ABR. The methodology used may serve as a template for outcomes-based procedural skills training in general.
引用
收藏
页码:1655 / 1670
页数:16
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] The Bankart Performance Metrics Combined With a Shoulder Model Simulator Create a Precise and Accurate Training Tool for Measuring Surgeon Skill
    Angelo, Richard L.
    Pedowitz, Robert A.
    Ryu, Richard K. N.
    Gallagher, Anthony G.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (09): : 1639 - 1654
  • [2] Measuring patient perceptions of surgeon communication performance in the treatment of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer using the communication assessment tool
    Schumm, Max A.
    Ohev-Shalom, Roben
    Nguyen, Dalena T.
    Kim, Jiyoon
    Tseng, Chi-Hong
    Zanocco, Kyle A.
    SURGERY, 2021, 169 (02) : 282 - 288