Purpose: To determine if previously validated performance metrics for an arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) coupled with a cadaveric shoulder are a valid assessment tool with the ability to discriminate between the performances of experienced and novice surgeons and to establish a proficiency benchmark for an ABR using a cadaveric shoulder. Methods: Ten master/associate master faculty from an Arthroscopy Association of North America Resident Course (experienced group) were compared with 12 postgraduate year 4 and postgraduate year 5 orthopaedic residents (novice group). Each group was instructed to perform a diagnostic arthroscopy and a 3 suture anchor Bankart repair on a cadaveric shoulder. The procedure was videotaped in its entirety and independently scored in blinded fashion by a pair of trained reviewers. Scoring was based on defined and previously validated metrics for an ABR and included steps, errors, "sentinel" (more serious) errors, and time. Results: The inter-rater reliability was 0.92. Novice surgeons made 50% more errors (5.86 v 2.95, P = .013), showed more performance variability (SD, 1.86 v 0.55), and took longer to perform the procedure (45.5 minutes v 25.9 minutes, P < .001). The greatest difference in errors related to suture delivery and management (exclusive of knot tying) (1.95 v 0.45, P = .024). Conclusions: The assessment tool composed of validated arthroscopic Bankart metrics coupled with a cadaveric shoulder accurately distinguishes the performance of experienced from novice orthopaedic surgeons. A benchmark based on the mean performance of the experienced group includes completion of a 3-anchor Bankart repair, and enacting no more than 3 total errors and 1 sentinel error. Clinical Relevance: Validated procedural metrics combined with the use of a cadaveric shoulder can be used to assess the performance of an ABR. The methodology used may serve as a template for outcomes-based procedural skills training in general.
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
Schumm, Max A.
Ohev-Shalom, Roben
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sect Endocrine Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
Ohev-Shalom, Roben
Nguyen, Dalena T.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sect Endocrine Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
Nguyen, Dalena T.
Kim, Jiyoon
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Los Angeles, CA USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
Kim, Jiyoon
Tseng, Chi-Hong
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
Tseng, Chi-Hong
Zanocco, Kyle A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sect Endocrine Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA