Does public concern matter to the welfare cost of air pollution? Evidence from Chinese cities

被引:7
|
作者
Li, Shuyuan [1 ,2 ]
Hui, Eddie C. M. [3 ]
Wen, Haizhen [4 ]
Liu, Hongjie [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Real Estate Studying, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ City Coll, Sch Spatial Planning & Design, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Polytech Inst, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PM2; 5; pollution; Public concern; Welfare cost; Willingness to pay; Housing prices; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PREFECTURE-LEVEL CITIES; REAL-ESTATE VALUATION; PM2.5; CONCENTRATIONS; CLEAN-AIR; QUALITY; MODELS; HEALTH; SMOG; AMENITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2022.103992
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Accurate estimation of the welfare cost of air pollution provides an essential reference for government authorities to formulate air prevention and control actions. Although several attempts have been made on this issue, biases are present in the estimation results due to residents' different concerns and sensitivities to air pollution. By using a panel dataset of major Chinese cities from 2014 to 2018, this study investigates how heterogeneous public concerns contribute to welfare costs of air pollution from a housing market perspective. The Baidu search index was presented as a proxy of public concern about air pollution. Results show that a 1 % increase in air pollutant concentrations leads to a 0.495 % to 0.620 % decrease in housing prices, validating the moderating effect of public concern on the welfare costs of air pollution. Public concern increases residents' willingness to pay for clean air, and this increase is associated with current pollution exposure. The findings suggest that government authorities should consider the variability of residents' willingness to pay and actual pollution levels when developing environmental policies and cost-benefit assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does Air Pollution Impact Fiscal Sustainability? Evidence from Chinese Cities
    Gao, Ge
    Li, Xiuting
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Dong, Jichang
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (21)
  • [2] Marginal abatement cost, air pollution and economic growth: Evidence from Chinese cities
    Ji, D. J.
    Zhou, P.
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 86
  • [3] Highway toll and air pollution: Evidence from Chinese cities
    Fu, Shihe
    Gu, Yizhen
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 83 : 32 - 49
  • [4] Political influence and air pollution: Evidence from Chinese cities
    Shao, Wen-Chao
    Chou, Li-Chen
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (07)
  • [5] Does new energy demonstration city policy curb air pollution? Evidence from Chinese cities
    Wang, Shanyong
    Ma, Ling
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 918
  • [6] Does air pollution inhibit digital finance? Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities
    Zheng, Liya
    Cen, Tao
    Wu, Qiaoyun
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [7] Does the public haze pollution concern expressed on online platforms promoted pollution control? - Evidence from Chinese online platforms
    Wu, Wenqi
    Wang, Wenwen
    Zhang, Lu
    Wang, Qiaoyu
    Wang, Lujing
    Zhang, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 318
  • [8] Ranking effect in air pollution governance: Evidence from Chinese cities
    Shi, Chenchen
    Guo, Feng
    Shi, Qingling
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 251
  • [9] Is air pollution detrimental to regional innovation? Evidence from Chinese cities
    Zhang, Min
    Chung, Seung-hun
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2020, 51 (04) : 1657 - 1689
  • [10] Does public concern over haze pollution matter? Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China
    Li, Chuandong
    Ma, Xiaowei
    Fu, Tingbin
    Guan, Shuaihua
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 755