Comparative study between volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in prevention of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Hassan, Ramy Mohammed [1 ]
Mahmoud, Hoda Omar [1 ]
Abd el Aal, Wael Ahmed [1 ]
Abdelmotaleb, Mona Ahmed Mohamed [1 ]
Shabana, Tarek Samir [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, Cairo 11591, Egypt
关键词
VCV; PCV; Atelectasis; OXYGENATION;
D O I
10.1186/s42077-020-00080-z
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Atelectasis can result during general anesthesia from mechanical ventilation and decrease in lung volume particularly in morbidly obese patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic sleeve surgery, which may result in the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including hypoxemia and pneumonia, with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Objective: To compare between volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in prevention of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery. Methods: This is a randomized prospective comparative clinical study with a total of 52 morbidly obese patients who were randomly divided into 2 groups; 26 patients in group (V) for VCV and 26 in group (P) for PCV arterial blood samples were obtained, and PaCO2, PaO2, and SaO(2)were obtained and recorded. ABG analyses were also obtained 30 min, 12 h, and 24 h post-extubation, and PaCO2, PaO2, and SaO(2)were obtained and recorded. Results: The results of this study revealed no significant differences between PCV and VCV as regards the incidence of postoperative lung atelectasis immediately postoperative (69.2% with VCV vs 61.5% with PCV,p= 0.368), 12 h postoperative (61.5% with VCV vs 53.8% with PCV,p= 0.282), and 24 h postoperative (53.8% with VCV vs 46.2% with PCV,p= 0.325). There were also no significant differences between VCV and PCV as regards baseline, intra-, and post-operative PaCO(2)levels as well as baseline and postoperative SaO(2)and PaO(2)values. However, PCV showed better intraoperative oxygenation compared to VCV. SaO(2)was 96.32% +/- 1.85 and 97.25% +/- 1.37 in VCV and PCV groups respectively (p= 0.027) while PaO(2)was 212.75 mmHg +/- 20.13 and 225.8 mmHg +/- 18.69 in VCV and PCV groups respectively (p= 0.011). Conclusion: Despite a slight improvement in intraoperative oxygenation parameters (PO2, SaO(2)) with PCV than VCV, there is no significant difference between VCV and PCV in the prevention of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis; moreover, there is no difference in postoperative oxygenation parameters in morbidly obese patients who undergo laparoscopic sleeve surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative study between volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in prevention of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery
    Ramy Mohammed Hassan
    Hoda Omar Mahmoud
    Wael Ahmed Abd el Aal
    Mona Ahmed Mohamed Abdelmotaleb
    Tarek Samir Shabana
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 12
  • [2] Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients
    De Baerdemaeker, L. E. C.
    Van der Herten, C.
    Gillardin, J. M.
    Pattyn, P.
    Mortier, E. P.
    Szegedi, L. L.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2008, 18 (06) : 680 - 685
  • [3] Comparison of Volume-controlled and Pressure-controlled Ventilation during Laparoscopic Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Patients
    L. E. C. De Baerdemaeker
    C. Van der Herten
    J. M. Gillardin
    P. Pattyn
    E. P. Mortier
    L. L. Szegedi
    Obesity Surgery, 2008, 18 : 680 - 685
  • [4] A comparison between volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in providing better oxygenation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Gupta, Sampa Dutta
    Kundu, Sudeshna Bhar
    Ghose, Tapas
    Maji, Sunanda
    Mitra, Koel
    Mukherjee, Maitreyee
    Mandal, Sripurna
    Sarbapalli, Debabrata
    Bhattacharya, Sulagna
    Bhattacharya, Saikat
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 56 (03) : 276 - 282
  • [5] Comparison of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation and Volume-Controlled Ventilation During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Sen, Oznur
    Inal, Ferda Yilmaz
    Toptas, Mehmet
    Aydin, Nurdan
    Sayilgan, Nevzat Cem
    Tutuncu, Ayse Cigdem
    Tas, Aytul
    Nayman, Fatime
    Ozenc, Ecder
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2014, 52 (02): : 75 - 79
  • [6] Comparison of pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation in obese patients during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position
    Toker, Melike Korkmaz
    Altiparmak, Basak
    Uysal, Ali Ihsan
    Demirbilek, Semra Gumus
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2019, 69 (06): : 553 - 560
  • [7] Pressure-Controlled vs Volume-Controlled Ventilation During Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
    Ogurlu, Mustafa
    Kucuk, Mert
    Bilgin, Ferruh
    Sizlan, Ali
    Yanarates, Oemer
    Eksert, Sami
    Karasahin, Emre
    Cosar, Ahmet
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (03) : 295 - 300
  • [8] A comparison of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Tyagi, A.
    Kumar, R.
    Sethi, A. K.
    Mohta, M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (06) : 503 - 508
  • [9] Evaluation of the Effect of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode vs. Volume-Controlled Ventilation Mode on Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Turan Civraz, Ayse Zeynep
    Saracoglu, Ayten
    Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (10):
  • [10] Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed during laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position
    Assad, Osama M.
    El Sayed, Ayman A.
    Khalil, Mohamed A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 34 : 55 - 61