Factors Influencing Men Undertaking Active Surveillance for the Management of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:75
|
作者
Davison, B. Joyce [1 ,2 ]
Oliffe, John L. [3 ]
Pickles, Tom [4 ]
Mroz, Lawrence
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Prostate Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SELECTIVE DELAYED INTERVENTION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; CAPSURE; INFORMATION; CARCINOMA; PARTNERS; BRACHYTHERAPY; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1188/09.ONF.89-96
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objectives: To identify and describe decision-making influences on men who decide to manage their low-risk prostate cancer with active surveillance. Research Approach: Qualitative, semistructured interview. Setting: The Prostate Centre at Vancouver General Hospital in Canada. Participants: 25 patients diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer and on active Surveillance. Methodologic Approach: An interpretative, descriptive, qualitative design. Main Research Variables: Factors that influenced men's decisions to take up active surveillance. Findings: The specialists' description of the prostate cancer was the most influential factor on men choosing active surveillance. Patients did not consider their prostate cancer to be life threatening and, in general, were relieved that no treatment was required. Avoiding treatment-related suffering and physical dysfunction and side effects such as impotence and incontinence was cited as the major reason to delay treatment. Few men actively sought treatment or health-promotion information following their treatment decision. Female partners played a supportive role in the decision. The need for active treatment if the cancer progressed was acknowledged. Patients were hopeful that new treatments would be available when and if they needed them. Being older and having comorbidities did not preclude the desire for future active treatment. Patients carried on with their lives as usual and did not report having any major distress related to being on active surveillance. Conclusions: The study findings indicate that men are strongly influenced by the treating specialist in taking up active surveillance and planning future active treatments. As such, most men relied on their specialists' recommendation and did not perceive the need for any adjunct therapy or support until the cancer required active treatment. Interpretation: Oncology nurses should work collaboratively with specialists to ensure that men receive the information they need to make informed treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 96
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Self-Management of Uncertainty Among Men Undertaking Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Oliffe, John L.
    Davison, B. Joyce
    Pickles, Tom
    Mroz, Lawrence
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (04) : 432 - 443
  • [2] Active surveillance for men with low-risk prostate cancer
    Sturch, Paul
    Kirby, Roger
    Challacombe, Ben
    TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MENS HEALTH, 2014, 5 (02) : 14 - 16
  • [3] Active Surveillance for Black Men With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Shen, Xinglei
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Chen, Ronald C.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (17): : 1733 - 1734
  • [4] THE QUALITY OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR MEN WITH LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Levy, Mya E.
    Meyers, Stephanie
    Wood, David P.
    Montie, James E.
    Miller, David C.
    Wei, John T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 179 - 179
  • [5] USE OF HOLEP IN MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Schober, Jared
    Stensland, Kristian
    Mandeville, Jessica
    Moinzadeh, Alireza
    Canes, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1188 - E1188
  • [6] Selecting Active Surveillance: Decision-Making Factors for Men with a Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Lobo, Tania
    Van Den Eeden, Stephen K.
    Davis, Kimberly M.
    Luta, George
    Leimpeter, Amethyst D.
    Aaronson, David
    Penson, David F.
    Taylor, Kathryn
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (08) : 962 - 974
  • [7] SELECTING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: DECISION-MAKING FACTORS FOR MEN WITH A LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Lobo, Tania
    Van den Eeden, Stephen K.
    Luta, George
    Davis, Kimberly M.
    Aaronsen, David
    Taylor, Kathryn L.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 : S336 - S336
  • [8] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 225 - 230
  • [9] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Herlemann, Annika
    Stief, Christian G.
    UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (02): : 269 - 278
  • [10] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Laurence Klotz
    Current Urology Reports, 2015, 16