Metrological intercomparison of six terrestrial laser scanning systems

被引：7

作者：

Gonzalez-Jorge, Higinio ^{[1
]}

Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, Pablo ^{[2
,3
]}

Shen, Yueqian ^{[4
]}

Laguela, Susana ^{[2
]}

Diaz-Vilarino, Lucia ^{[1
]}

Lindenbergh, Roderik ^{[4
]}

Gonzalez-Aguilera, Diego ^{[2
]}

Arias, Pedro ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Vigo, Sch Min & Energy Engn, Galician Aerosp Innovat Ctr CINAE, Geotech Grp, Vigo 36310, Spain

[2] Univ Salamanca, Dept Cartog & Land Engn, Polytech Sch Avila, Hornos Caleros 50, Avila 05003, Spain

[3] Univ Leon, Dept Min Technol Topog & Struct, Avda Astorga S-N, Ponferrada 24401, Spain

[4] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Geosci & Remote Sensing, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands

来源：

IET SCIENCE MEASUREMENT & TECHNOLOGY | 2018年 / 12卷 / 02期

关键词：

optical scanners; remote sensing by laser beam; three-dimensional printing; terrestrial laser scanning systems; phase shift; time of flight scanners; three-dimensional printing spheres; metrological intercomparison; MICROSOFT KINECT; VERIFICATION; REGISTRATION; DEFORMATION; RESOLUTION; SENSORS;

D O I：

10.1049/iet-smt.2017.0209

中图分类号：

TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];

学科分类号：

0808 ; 0809 ;

摘要：

Intercomparison among six terrestrial laser scanner systems focused on the measurement of small elements (<0.5m) is performed. Phase shift (PS) and time of flight (ToF) scanners are considered. Two standard artefacts containing three-dimensional printing spheres and steps of variable height are used for the experiment. Results show errors between -4.5 and 3.5mm in the measurement of distances between step planes. The most stable systems for measuring small elements seem the Leica C10, Faro Photon and Riegl LMS Z390i. The quality of the results is linked to the overall quality of the system rather than the specific technology used for range measurement (PS or ToF) which does not appear to be a determining factor.

引用

页码：218 / 222

页数：5

共 50 条

[1] Metrological aspects in terrestrial laser-scanning technology
Martin, Zogg Hans
Ingensand, Hilmar
7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 1514 - 1518
[2] Metrological comparison of terrestrial laser scanning systems Riegl LMS Z390i and Trimble GX
Gonzalez-Jorge, Higinio
Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, Pablo
Gonzalez-Aguilera, Diego
Varela-Gonzalez, Maria
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 50 (11)
[3] Standard artifact for the geometric verification of terrestrial laser scanning systems
Gonzalez-Jorge, H.
Riveiro, B.
Armesto, J.
Arias, P.
OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 43 (07): : 1249 - 1256
[4] Methods for Geometric Accuracy Investigations of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Systems
Kersten, Thomas P.
Mechelke, Klaus
Lindstaedt, Maren
Sternberg, Harald
PHOTOGRAMMETRIE FERNERKUNDUNG GEOINFORMATION, 2009, (04): : 301 - 315
[5] A simplified procedure of metrological testing of the terrestrial laser scanners
Pejic, Marko
Ogrizovic, Vukan
Bozic, Branko
Milovanovic, Branko
Marosan, Stevan
MEASUREMENT, 2014, 53 : 260 - 269
[6] Topic: Terrestrial Laser Scanning
Kersten, Thomas P.
Przybilla, Heinz-Juergen
PHOTOGRAMMETRIE FERNERKUNDUNG GEOINFORMATION, 2009, (01): : 5 - 7
[7] DEVELOPMENT OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING SIMULATOR
Luhmann, Thomas
Chizhova, Maria
Gorkovchuk, Denys
Popovas, Darius
Gorkovchuk, Julia
Hess, Mona
9TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP 3D-ARCH 3D VIRTUAL RECONSTRUCTION AND VISUALIZATION OF COMPLEX ARCHITECTURES, VOL. 46-2, 2022, : 329 - 334
[8] Target identification in terrestrial laser scanning
Ge, X.
Wunderlich, T.
SURVEY REVIEW, 2015, 47 (341) : 129 - 140
[9] Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Forest Inventories
Liang, Xinlian
Kaartinen, Harri
Hyyppa, Juha
Pfeifer, Norbert
GIM INTERNATIONAL-THE WORLDWIDE MAGAZINE FOR GEOMATICS, 2016, 30 (02): : 26 - 29
[10] Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Vegetation Sampling
Richardson, Jeffrey J.
Moskal, L. Monika
Bakker, Jonathan D.
SENSORS, 2014, 14 (11) : 20304 - 20319

← 1 2 3 4 5 →