Content Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments Used to Measure Burnout

被引:1
|
作者
Sabariego, Carla [1 ]
Al-Kudwah, Hasnaa Murid [1 ]
Cieza, Alarcos [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol IBE, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[3] Swiss Parapleg Res, Nottwil, Switzerland
关键词
professional burnout; patient outcome assessment; psychometrics; qualitative research; International Classification of Functioning; Disability; and Health (ICF); INVENTORY; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; NURSES; EXPERIENCES; CANCER; CARE;
D O I
10.1027/1015-5759/a000210
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to compare the content of patient-reported outcome (PRO) burnout measures and to examine the degree of overlap between them and psychosocial difficulties (PSD) experienced by persons with burnout. The most frequently used PRO and qualitative studies were identified in two systematic literature reviews. Psychosocial difficulties identified in both sources were standardized and a qualitative content comparison was performed. Seven PROs and seven qualitative studies were selected. Energy and drive, emotional functions and work were key themes of both sources. Disparities were observed for problems in areas such as sleep, attention or family relationships, which were reported in several qualitative studies, but are seldom addressed in PROs. Several areas important to persons with burnout, such as family relationships, are seldom measured by currently used PROs. From a biopsychosocial perspective, these instruments cannot therefore be considered comprehensive enough to capture the whole experience of burnout and should be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 99
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Responsiveness of Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Lumbar Microdiscectomy
    Vishwanathan, Karthik
    Braithwaite, Ian
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (05) : 753 - 762
  • [2] Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments Used With Pediatric Patients With Facial Differences: A Systematic Review
    Wickert, Natasha M.
    Riff, Karen W. Y. Wong
    Mansour, Mark
    Forrest, Christopher R.
    Goodacre, Timothy E. E.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2018, 55 (07): : 989 - 998
  • [3] Mindfulness: a systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient-reported outcome (PRO)
    Taehwan Park
    Maryanne Reilly-Spong
    Cynthia R. Gross
    Quality of Life Research, 2013, 22 : 2639 - 2659
  • [4] Mindfulness: a systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient-reported outcome (PRO)
    Park, Taehwan
    Reilly-Spong, Maryanne
    Gross, Cynthia R.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (10) : 2639 - 2659
  • [5] Choosing a patient-reported outcome measure
    McClimans, Leah M.
    Browne, John
    THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2011, 32 (01) : 47 - 60
  • [6] Choosing a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
    McClimans, Leah M.
    Browne, John P.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 125 - 125
  • [7] Choosing a patient-reported outcome measure
    Leah M. McClimans
    John Browne
    Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2011, 32 : 47 - 60
  • [8] Development and content validity of a hemodialysis symptom patient-reported outcome measure
    Flythe, Jennifer E.
    Dorough, Adeline
    Narendra, Julia H.
    Wingard, Rebecca L.
    Dalrymple, Lorien S.
    DeWalt, Darren A.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (01) : 253 - 265
  • [9] Development and content validity of a hemodialysis symptom patient-reported outcome measure
    Jennifer E. Flythe
    Adeline Dorough
    Julia H. Narendra
    Rebecca L. Wingard
    Lorien S. Dalrymple
    Darren A. DeWalt
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 253 - 265
  • [10] Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure
    Psotka, Mitchell A.
    Teerlink, John R.
    JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2018, 6 (07) : 561 - 563