Predicting going concern opinion with data mining

被引:73
作者
Martens, David [1 ]
Bruynseels, Liesbeth [2 ]
Baesens, Bart [1 ,3 ]
Willekens, Marleen [2 ,4 ]
Vanthienen, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Decis Sci & Informat Management, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Accountancy, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Southampton, Sch Management, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[4] Tilburg Univ, Dept Accountancy, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Going concern opinion; Audit; Data Mining; Classification;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2008.01.003
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The auditor is required to evaluate whether substantial doubt exists about the client entity's ability to continue as a going Concern. Accounting debacles in recent years have shown the importance of proper and thorough audit analysis. Since the 80s, many studies have applied statistical techniques, mainly logistic regression, as an automated tool to guide the going concern opinion formulation. In this paper, we introduce more advanced data mining techniques, such as support vector machines and rule-based classifiers. and empirically investigate the ongoing discussion concerning the sampling methodology. To provide specific audit guidelines, we infer rules with the state-of-the-art classification technique AntMiner+, which are subsequently converted into a decision table allowing for truly easy and user-friendly consultation in every day audit business practices. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 777
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 1988, 59 AICPA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, P 13 INT JOINT C ART
[3]   Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring [J].
Baesens, B ;
Van Gestel, T ;
Viaene, S ;
Stepanova, M ;
Suykens, J ;
Vanthienen, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2003, 54 (06) :627-635
[4]   Using neural network rule extraction and decision tables for credit-risk evaluation [J].
Baesens, B ;
Setiono, R ;
Mues, C ;
Vanthienen, J .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (03) :312-329
[5]  
BAESENS B, 2003, THESIS KU LUEVEN
[6]   Further evidence on the auditor's going-concern report: The influence of management plans [J].
Behn, BK ;
Kaplan, SE ;
Krumwiede, KR .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2001, 20 (01) :13-28
[7]   EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF AUDIT UNCERTAINTY QUALIFICATIONS [J].
BELL, TB ;
TABOR, RH .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (02) :350-370
[8]  
CARCELLO JV, 1995, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V14, P133
[9]   Audit committee composition and auditor reporting [J].
Carcello, JV ;
Neal, TL .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2000, 75 (04) :453-467
[10]   Going-concern opinions: The effects of partner compensation plans and client size [J].
Carcello, JV ;
Hermanson, DR ;
Huss, HF .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2000, 19 (01) :67-77