Randomised trial of compliance with flexible (C-Flex) and standard continuous positive airway pressure for severe obstructive sleep apnea

Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is often treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) but the effectiveness of treatment is probably limited by poor compliance. CPAP manufacturers are thus attempting to devise more comfortable PAP devices in an effort to improve compliance. An example of such a novel device is Flexible expiratory-modulated PAP (C-Flex mode Respironics REMstar Pro, Murraysville, PA, USA). Materials and methods We aimed to compare compliance between C-Flex and standard CPAP in patients with severe OSA in a randomised controlled trial. Nineteen patients with severe OSA (mean +/- SD Apnea Hypopnea Index=78 +/- 33/h, Epworth 14 +/- 4, PAP 8-17 cm H2O, BMI=39 +/- 10 kg/m(2)) and aged 20-63 years were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of either C-Flex (setting II, n=9) or CPAP (n=10). Results Patients treated with C-Flex exhibited a trend toward higher compliance with their PAP devices compared to patients treated with standard CPAP (4.7 +/- 2.9 vs. 3.0 +/- 2.1 h/night, p=0.15, effect size=0.68). Paradoxically, improvements in subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) were greater in those who received CPAP than C-Flex (8.1 + 4.9 vs. 2.1 + 4.0 points, p=0.014, effect size=1.46). Improvements in objective wakefulness (Modified Maintenance of Wakefulness Test) and simple reaction times (Psychomotor Vigilance Task) were not significantly different between treatments. This randomised trial provides some evidence that C-Flex might increase initial treatment compliance, compared to CPAP, in patients with severe OSA. However, this trend toward greater compliance was not associated with better short-term treatment outcomes for patients. These findings need to be confirmed in a larger, longer-term trial.