A systematic review of magnetic resonance lymphography for the evaluation of peripheral lymphedema

被引:17
|
作者
Misere, Renee M. L. [1 ]
Wolfs, Joost A. G. N. [1 ]
Lobbes, Marc B. I. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. [1 ]
Qiu, Shan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, P Debyelaan 25, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Geleen, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Magnetic resonance lymphangiography; MRL; Lymphography; Peripheral lymphedema; Lymphedema; RESOLUTION MR LYMPHANGIOGRAPHY; CANCER-RELATED LYMPHEDEMA; BREAST-CANCER; LYMPHATIC-SYSTEM; RADIONUCLIDE LYMPHOSCINTIGRAPHY; SINGLE-CENTER; CONTRAST; CLASSIFICATION; MICROSURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.03.007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Visualization of the lymphatic system is necessary for both early diagnosis and associated treatments. A promising imaging modality is magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL). The aim of this review was to summarize different MRL protocols, to assess the clinical value in patients with peripheral lymphedema, and to define minimal requirements necessary for visualization of lymphatics. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in December 2018. Studies performing MRL in patients with peripheral lymphedema or healthy participants were included. Study design, population, etiology, duration of lymphedema, clinical staging, contrast agent, dose, injection site, and technical magnetic resonance imaging details were analyzed. No meta-analyses were performed because of different study aims and heterogeneity of the study populations. Results: Twenty-five studies involving 1609 patients with both primary lymphedema (n = 669) and secondary lymphedema (n = 657) were included. Upper and lower limbs were examined in 296 and 602 patients, respectively. Twenty-two studies used a gadolinium-based contrast agent that was injected intracutaneously or subcutaneously in the interdigital web spaces. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted combined with T2-weighted protocols were most frequently used. T1-weighted images showed lymphatics in 63.3% to 100%, even in vessels with a diameter of >= 0.5 mm. Dermal backflow and a honeycomb pattern were clearly recognized. Conclusions: MRL identifies superficial lymphatic vessels with a diameter of >= 0.5mmwith high sensitivity and specificity and accurately shows abnormal lymphatics and lymphatic drainage patterns. Therefore, MRL could be of clinical value in both early and advanced stages of peripheral lymphedema. Minimum requirements of an MRL protocol should consist of a gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence combined with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, with acquisition at least 30 minutes after injection of contrast material.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Systematic Review Comparing Lymphoscintigraphy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in the Assessment of Peripheral Lymphedema
    Quartuccio, Natale
    Agugliaro, Federica
    Alongi, Pierpaolo
    Sturiale, Letterio
    Arnone, Gaspare
    Corrao, Salvatore
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 19 (05) : 469 - 475
  • [2] Interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography: is it a new method for the diagnosis of lymphedema?
    Dimakakos, E.
    Koureas, A.
    Koutoulidis, V.
    Skiadas, V.
    Katsenis, K.
    Arkadopoulos, N.
    Gouliamos, A.
    Vlachos, L.
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2007, 26 (04) : 367 - 371
  • [3] Evaluation of peripheral nerve injury by magnetic resonance neurography: A systematic review
    Silva, Jefferson Braga
    Chammas, Michel
    Chammas, Pierre-Emmanuel
    Andrade, Rubens
    Hochhegger, Bruno
    Leal, Bruna Leiria Mereje
    HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2022, 41 (01): : 7 - 13
  • [4] Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography for Evaluation of Lymph Node Transfer for Secondary Upper Limb Lymphedema
    Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko
    Yamamoto, Takumi
    Tanakura, Kenta
    Fuse, Yuma
    Hayashi, Akitatsu
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (04) : 601E - 603E
  • [5] Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography for Evaluation of Lymph Node Transfer for Secondary Upper Limb Lymphedema
    Arrive, Lionel
    Derhy, Sarah
    Dlimi, Chrif
    El Mouhadi, Sanaa
    Monnier-Cholley, Laurence
    Becker, Corinne
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (06) : 806E - 811E
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral lymphedema
    Werner, GT
    Scheck, R
    Kaiserling, E
    LYMPHOLOGY, 1998, 31 (01) : 34 - 36
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral lymphedema
    Insua, EM
    Viano, J
    Martinez, V
    LYMPHOLOGY, 1997, 30 (01) : 24 - 25
  • [8] Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography in Secondary Lymphedema Due to Prostate Cancer
    Cellina, Michaela
    Gibelli, Daniele
    Martinenghi, Carlo
    Soresina, Massimo
    Menozzi, Andrea
    Giardini, Denisa
    Oliva, Giancarlo
    LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 19 (04) : 355 - 361
  • [9] Reply: Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography for Evaluation of Lymph Node Transfer for Secondary Upper Limb Lymphedema
    Arrive, Lionel
    Becker, Corinne
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (04) : 603E - 604E
  • [10] Impact of Magnetic Resonance Lymphography on Lymphaticolvenular Anastomosis for Lower-Limb Lymphedema
    Yasunaga, Yoshichika
    Kinjo, Yuto
    Nakajima, Yuta
    Mimura, Shinei
    Kobayashi, Miharu
    Yuzuriha, Shunsuke
    Kondoh, Shoji
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2022, 38 (02) : 121 - 128